arXiv:2609.28049v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Video understanding is usually benchmarked on curated, single-actor, or professionally filmed clips, and a strong score there is routinely read as ev...
By Sai Varun Kodathala, Prashanth Pollishetty, Jaylen Cargill
Video understanding is usually benchmarked on curated, single-actor, or professionally filmed clips, and a strong score there is routinely read as evidence a model is robust enough for deployment. Ama...
arXiv:2606. 28570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Athlete assessment is a critical process for tracking physical progress and identifying elite talent.
By Deep Ghosal, Ishani Sen, Wazib Ansar, Amlan Chakrabarti
arXiv:2608. 08736v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fitness Action Quality Assessment (AQA) is important for intelligent sports training, yet the capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in this setting remain underexplored.
By Kaili Zheng, Kaiwen Wang, Xun Zhu, Qingyuan Yang, Chenyi Guo, Ji Wu
arXiv:2609.36628v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can generate rich video captions, yet often misidentify which person performs an action or which limb is involved, partic...
By Yanan Wang, Tingsong Li, Kaixun Jiang, Chongyang Zhong, Chenwei Xoe, Zhaohe Liao
VisionQ is a new benchmark for qualitative analysis in computer vision that evaluates vision‑language models (VLMs) on criterion‑conditioned visual discrimination. It is built from over 1,800 peer‑reviewed comparison figures in CVPR and ICCV papers, linking each image crop to author‑stated visual claims through 3,911 hand‑annotated data points. The benchmark includes a 51‑leaf taxonomy of visual criteria, a protocol that hides method identities and reports accuracy per criterion, and a DPO‑tuned Gemma‑4‑E4B judge that improves accuracy on a held‑out test set.
By Vu Dinh Xuan, Duc-Hai Nguyen, Minh-Dung Dao, Vu Quynh Giao, Quang Hong Nguyen, Binh-Son Hua, Barry O'Sullivan, David Murphy, Hoang D. Nguyen
Reliable evaluation of human motion understanding is fundamental to advancing embodied AI, robotics, and animation. However, existing benchmarks suffer from coarse semantic granularity, undifferentiated difficulty, limited annotation quality, and pervasive answer ambiguity, leaving them unable to diagnose where current models fail.
arXiv:2607. 14616v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision--language models have become increasingly capable of interpreting visual scenes, but it remains unclear whether they can use information to make strategically effective decisions.
By Jasin Cekinmez, Addison J. Wu, Haotian Xia, Akshaya Bharadhwaj, Anay Putty, Anirudh Ravishankar, Jaewoong Lee, Jinglin Xiao, Kyumin Andrew Shim, Mishika Ahuja, Nisarga Patil, Leo Liu, Zhuohan Liu, Weining Shen
arXiv:2608. 04589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: EgoCross is a cross-domain egocentric video question answering benchmark designed to evaluate whether multimodal large language models can generalize beyond common daily-life scenarios.
By Yuqian Fu, Tianwen Qian, Yanjun Li, Yu Li, Kunyu Peng, Xu Zheng, Yongqin Xian, Alessio Tonioni, Yanwei Fu, Xiaoling Wang, Danda Paudel, Federico Tombari, Luc Van Gool, Leyi Wu, Yifan Zhao, Jinjie Zhang, Yinchuan Li, Yingcong Chen, Zixu Li, Zhiwei Chen, Zhiheng Fu, Wenbo Wang, Yupeng Hu, Weili Guan, Liqiang Nie, Takuya Murakawa, Toru Tamaki, Yi Wen, Zhenglin Du, Zhengyang Li, Lingling Li, Licheng Jiao, Wenping Ma
arXiv:2608. 07932v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sports video analysis is crucial for athletic analytics and broadcasting enhancement.
By Yizhi Li, Jiawei Jiang, Guanhong Wang, Yingcai Wu, Gaoang Wang
arXiv:2603. 10652v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In real-world deployment, vision-language models often encounter disturbances such as weather, occlusion, and camera motion.
By Yangfan He, Changgyu Boo, Jaehong Yoon
WorldReward introduces a vision‑language model–based reward system for camera‑conditioned world models, combining action consistency and visual quality evaluation. It processes paired videos by splitting them into action‑aligned chunks, structuring visual evidence, and aggregating decisions through voting. The model is trained on a large, reasoning‑augmented preference dataset and outperforms GPT‑5.5 on a human‑annotated benchmark, improving both action execution and visual quality when applied to RL post‑training.
By Yibin Wang, Zehan Wang, Junshu Tang, Zhimin Li, Yujie Zhou, Jiazi Bu, Pengyang Ling, Feng Han, Zhixiong Zhang, Long Xing, Shengyuan Ding, Ziang Li, Cheng Jin, Yuhang Zang, Jiaqi Wang, Tianyu Pang