arXiv Computation and Language
PersonaPath is a new benchmark for knowledge‑centric personalized learning path planning, pairing 2,000 learner personas with a hierarchical knowledge graph of 347 textbooks, 1,751 units, and 4,092 concepts across 77 subjects. The study evaluates large language models on this benchmark, finding that even the best model achieves only a 29.5% final pass rate in Basic Education and fails to exceed 44.7% in tailoring paths to individual learners, highlighting a significant adaptivity gap. This work underscores the challenge of moving beyond exercise‑centric recommendation toward goal‑oriented, curriculum‑scale guidance.
arXiv:2606. 11744v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are now widely used for everyday learning, but the underlying interactions are typically unstructured chats rather than following a curriculum.
By Sidney Tio, Arunesh Sinha, Pradeep Varakantham
arXiv:2606. 15349v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standardized examinations are typically treated as uniform syllabus coverage problems.
By Joy Bose, Om Thomas
arXiv:2608. 03206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) power educational applications from tutoring to essay scoring, but each is a point solution to a single task, and only recently have these point solutions been integrated into agents operating over a learning management system (LMS).
By Unggi Lee, Sookbun Lee, Yeil Jeong, Eunjoo Lee, Minchul Shin, Hoilym Kwon
arXiv:2604. 26962v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Education is one of the most promising real-world applications for Large Language Models (LLMs).
By Bingxi Zhao, Jiahao Zhang, Xubin Ren, Zirui Guo, Tianzhe Chu, Yi Ma, Chao Huang
arXiv:2509.05346v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted to support personalized learning, there remains limited understanding of how thei...
By Bo Yuan, Jiazi Hu
arXiv:2607. 05734v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation in the recommendation domain is a necessary precursor to RL training, but raw teacher traces are ill-suited to this task.
By Haz Sameen Shahgir, Yufei Li, Frank Shyu, Luke Simon, Sandeep Pandey, Xi Liu, Yue Dong
arXiv:2604. 04251v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Intelligent tutoring systems increasingly rely on reinforcement learning to personalise instruction, yet optimising for observable engagement signals can systematically decouple learner activity from genuine knowledge acquisition.
By Oluseyi Olukola, Nick Rahimi
arXiv:2608.21668v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate students at different mastery levels. These simulations can generate synthetic training...
By Yuan An, Emily Wang, Benjamin Wang, Ruhma Hashmi
arXiv:2608. 06530v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Planning a degree from official university sources requires solving two problems in order.
By Shuheng Cao, Weijia Zhang, Jiaqi Wu, Xiyun Hu, Yat Yang, Juqy Chen, Zhaoxiang Feng
arXiv:2607. 13103v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Knowledge tracing (KT) aims to predict students' future performance by modeling their evolving knowledge states from historical interactions.
By Duantengchuan Li, Yingqian Bi, Jinsong Chen, Rui Zhang, Mingwen Tong
arXiv:2609.28470v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Artificial intelligence offers an unprecedented opportunity to augment human capabilities, yet progress at the frontier has focused primarily on advanc...
By Curtis Northcutt, Inaara Hasmani, Kevin Feng, Trevor Khangi, Andreas Plesner, Jonas Mueller
arXiv:2603. 02830v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting future student responses to questions is particularly valuable for educational learning platforms where it enables effective interventions.
By Prarthana Bhattacharyya, Joshua Mitton, Ralph Abboud, Simon Woodhead