Real-Time Driver Safety Scoring Through Inverse Crash Probability Modeling
arXiv:2603. 14841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Road crashes remain a leading cause of preventable fatalities.
The paper introduces an edge‑assisted crowdsensing framework that uses handlebar‑mounted cameras to capture street‑level video, a vision‑language model to extract structured traffic attributes, and an explainable boosting machine to combine these with OpenStreetMap data and on‑bike kinematics for a 1‑9 safety score. On 1,362 annotated frames from two London routes, the model achieves 72.2 % binary accuracy and a mean absolute error of 1.011, with feature attribution revealing the impact of lane separation, painted lanes, and construction sites on safety ratings. The system operates efficiently at the network edge, requiring only 2.49 s per frame for extraction and 0.4 ms for scoring, and supports continuous monitoring at a cost of 1.4 accuracy points for 1,000 riders over a 20‑second interval.
arXiv:2603. 14841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Road crashes remain a leading cause of preventable fatalities.
arXiv:2510. 03314v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Ensuring the safety of vulnerable road users (VRUs), such as pedestrians and cyclists, remains a critical challenge, as conventional infrastructure-based measures are often insufficient in dynamic urban environments.
arXiv:2607. 16156v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Urban intersections are among the most hazardous locations in road networks, posing significant risks to vehicles and vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists.
The paper introduces a machine learning pipeline that predicts 2‑hour peak pedestrian volumes at 101 intersections in Portland, Oregon, using built‑environment, land‑use, and street‑network features from open GIS data. Starting from a Negative Binomial GLM, the authors add feature selection, count‑aware gradient boosting, and repeated cross‑validation, ultimately selecting a histogram‑based gradient boosting model with Poisson loss and L1 Lasso feature selection. This model reduces cross‑validated RMSE by 12% and holdout RMSE by 19% compared to the GLM baseline.
arXiv:2607. 21137v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Independent sidewalk mobility is essential for blind and visually impaired pedestrians (BVIPs), yet smartphone-based assistive navigation requires perception models that distinguish walkable sidewalks from adjacent unsafe regions.
arXiv:2511. 14592v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show great promise for autonomous driving, but their suitability for safety-critical scenarios is largely unexplored, raising safety concerns.
arXiv:2602. 23499v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Collecting a high-quality dataset is a critical task that demands meticulous attention to detail, as overlooking certain aspects can render the entire dataset unusable.
arXiv:2608. 19380v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While modern autonomous driving systems excel at perception tasks such as object detection and trajectory prediction, they lack the high-level causal reasoning required to interpret traffic accidents.
arXiv:2611.06007v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Motorized Two-Wheelers (MTWs) dominate personal transport across much of the Global South, yet remain largely overlooked in predictive perception resea...
CoSafe is a modular, ADS-agnostic framework that extends runtime safety assurance from ego-centric takeover to scene-level cooperative intervention in mixed-traffic autonomous driving. It uses vehicle-to-everything communication to allow roadside units to monitor hazards and jointly mitigate risks involving multiple vehicles. Evaluation on the InterDrive benchmark shows that CoSafe improves driving scores by 70.03%, reduces safety violations by 87.80%, and accurately identifies unsafe autonomous vehicles with an F3 score of 0.930 while meeting real-time constraints.
arXiv:2610.31835v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Temporary traffic control redirects vehicles through work zones, requiring automated vehicles to connect an interpretation of the visible devices to a...
The paper evaluates five vision‑language models on autonomous driving tasks under various visual input conditions, finding that visual corruption affects accuracy and confidence differently across models and datasets. It then tests Visual Evidence Augmentation (VEA) as an inference‑time technique to enhance reliability, observing mixed improvements depending on the model and setting.