arXiv:2607. 19771v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon and related matrix-sign optimizers are increasingly used to pre-train large language models, but their effect on the internal geometry of individual weight matrices is not well understood.
By Jiachun Li
The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.
By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv:2607. 23777v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The discovery of scaling laws has motivated training neural networks on ever increasing quantities of data.
By Anuj Apte
arXiv:2607. 22444v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For scale-invariant deep networks, Hyperball-style optimizers have shown strong performance in large-scale training by fixing the norms of matrix-valued parameters and normalizing updates.
By Yihao Xiao, Jialong Sun, Zitian Gao, Zeming Wei, Chutian Wang, Ran Tao, Jiaye Teng, Bryan Dai
arXiv:2610.28072v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Learning rate schedules are typically fixed before training begins, yet when fine-tuning large language models with low-rank adapters (LoRA), the appro...
By Jan Kobiolka, Christian Frey, Josif Grabocka
arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.
By Naoki Sato, Hiroki Naganuma, Hideaki Iiduka
arXiv:2606. 16899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Matrix based optimizers such as Muon can substantially speed up language model pretraining, but their gains over AdamW are observed to shrink as model size and data scale grow when using standard constant decoupled weight decay.
By Kaiyue Wen, Xingyu Dang, Kaifeng Lyu, Tengyu Ma, Percy Liang
The paper proposes a new update geometry for the language‑model head by treating the head and softmax as a single module and using Hilbert’s projective distance to measure functional change. It replaces the spectral norm with the Euclidean row diameter, derives a tractable RowNorm update rule, and demonstrates that RowNorm substantially reduces step diameters and Hilbert perturbations while only slightly increasing validation loss.
By Aditya Somasundaram, Charles Guille-Escuret, Alexander Moreno, Zhengzhong Liu, Eric Xing
arXiv:2610. 03306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing convergence analyses of Muon either assume exact orthogonalization or analyze classical Newton--Schulz polynomials, and guarantee only stationarity, so it is unresolved what Muon's five tuned Newton--Schulz steps preserve and whether that suffices to reach a prescribed neural-network training loss.
By Amartya Roy, Souvik Chakraborty
arXiv:2505. 23725v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: DiLoCo is a powerful framework for training large language models (LLMs), enabling larger optimal batch sizes and increased accelerator utilization under networking constraints.
By Benjamin Th\'erien, Xiaolong Huang, Aaron Defazio, Irina Rish, Eugene Belilovsky
arXiv:2607. 20512v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Muon optimizer reaches the grokking threshold on modular arithmetic faster than AdamW.
By Yufeng Wang
The paper analyzes the stochastic optimizer Muon, which orthogonalizes an exponential moving average of minibatch gradients, and compares its behavior to the baseline SignSGD on a high‑dimensional matrix‑valued least squares problem. It derives deterministic dynamics showing Muon’s sensitivity to an effective batch size and its failure to resolve small eigenmodes when whitening is exact and the effective batch is small, while Momentum and finite Newton–Shulz iterations can mitigate this. The study presents a phase diagram in terms of data and target exponents, indicating when Muon or SignSGD is preferable based on covariance spectrum steepness and target loss scaling.
By Elliot Paquette, Noah Marshall, Lucas Benigni, Guangyuan Wang, Atish Agarwala, Courtney Paquette