The paper introduces a controlled benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on key‑value pair extraction from documents with varying levels of OCR noise. It tests 136 configurations across five instruction‑tuned open‑weight LLMs, three datasets, and four text‑quality conditions, using deterministic decoding to generate 17,688 document‑level inferences. The study finds that clean‑text performance does not reliably predict real‑world robustness, model rankings can reverse under noisy conditions, and few‑shot demonstrations do not always improve accuracy, highlighting reliability risks in OCR‑to‑LLM pipelines.
By Zahra Anvari
arXiv:2605. 16409v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Optical character recognition (OCR) and multilingual scene-text understanding remain challenging for multimodal large language models (MLLMs), particularly in real-world images containing small or degraded text, cluttered layouts, occlusion, handwriting, and complex typography.
By Qinwu Xu, Yifan Jiang, Haoyu Ren
arXiv:2609.36136v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Compact OCR-specific vision-language models achieve strong document parsing performance, but often rely on costly supervision and focus primarily on vi...
By Xin Chen, Anan Du, Feng Feng, Pei Fu, Jian Luan, Longwei Xu, Shaojie Zhang, Hang Li, Heng Qu, Cheng Tan
arXiv:2609.37712v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is evolving from plain-text transcription toward general visual intelligence, requiring models to recognize, loca...
By GuangJian Team, Kaili Huang, Yongshuo Zhang, Bingtao Fu, Changjiang Jiang, Chenfan Qu, Chenfeng Zhang, Fangming Cui, Gaoyang Zhang, Jiangwei Xie, Jianshu Li, Jing Huang, Jingwen Bai, Mingqi Fang, Tao Fang, Weihong Zhang, Wenbo Du, Xiongfei Bai, Xuekang Zhu, Yinan Xia, Zhenming Wang, Jian Liu, Jingjing Liu, Xiang Qi, Weiqiang Wang
arXiv:2607. 16203v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Document parsing is a foundational step for document understanding tasks such as visual question answering and key information extraction, as it transforms unstructured scanned images into structured representations by extracting textual, visual, and layout information.
By Zihan Xu, Puzhen Wu, Lawrence Chun Man Lau, Wei Liu, Sirui Li, Yifan Peng, Yihao Ding
arXiv:2606. 01393v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Document parsing and recognition are fundamental capabilities for vision-language models (VLMs) and document processing systems.
By Minglai Yang, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Pengyuan Li, Xinyu Guo, Zhenting Qi, Konwoo Kim, Longtian Ye, Xiaolong Luo, Jinhe Bi, Henry Zhang, Haris Riaz, Xuan Zhang, Yunze Xiao, Bangya Liu, Tom Tang, Yunfei Zhao, Qunshu Lin, Zihan Wang, Minghao Liu, Michael Lingzhi Li, Yilun Du, Jesse Thomason, Rogerio Feris, Alex Pentland, Zexue He
arXiv:2602. 02014v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent genomic foundation models largely adopt large language model architectures that treat DNA as a one-dimensional token sequence.
By Hongxin Xiang, Pengsen Ma, Yunkang Cao, Di Yu, Haowen Chen, Xinyu Yang, Xiangxiang Zeng
This systematic literature review examines 97 studies on optical character recognition (OCR) from 2015 to 2025, tracing the evolution of AI models, application domains, data types, and linguistic coverage. It identifies key OCR models, evaluates their performance, strengths, and limitations, and highlights unresolved challenges such as limited resources for underrepresented languages, high variability in handwritten text, and constraints in real‑time applications. The review proposes promising approaches—including self‑supervised learning, multimodal AI, AutoML, AI‑assisted postprocessing, TinyML, and joint corpora creation—to enhance OCR accuracy and address these challenges for industrial use.
By Nuzhat Khan, Ab Al-Hadi Ab Rahman, Shahriyar Masud Rizvi, Ibrahim Yousef Alshareef, Muhammad Nadzir Marsono, Muhammad Paend Bakht, Mohd Shahrizal Rusli, Shahidatul Sadiah
UniLipi is a unified multi‑script OCR model trained on 13 Indic scripts to recognize handwritten manuscripts under challenging conditions such as varied line geometry, length, and interruptions by non‑textual elements. It uses script‑aware synthetic data generation to perform well even with limited real annotated data. The model also predicts script identity and per‑line character counts, aiding manuscript cataloging, and its representations transfer to contemporary Indic handwriting and several non‑Indic scripts.
By Tathagata Ghosh, Sai Madhusudan Gunda, Simran Singh Sandral, Ravi Kiran Sarvadevabhatla
The paper explores how synthetic data can be used to train a Thai OCR model without real OCR labels. By systematically varying factors such as typeface diversity, page structure, and handwriting glyphs, the authors identify which aspects of realism most improve transfer to real documents. Using these insights, they adapt a large PaddleOCR model into Wayu‑Paxa‑OCR‑Zero, achieving a median character error rate of 1.24% on printed pages and 20.55% on handwriting, outperforming existing Thai OCR systems.
By Kunat Pipatanakul
Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly replacing traditional OCR for document understanding, but this study shows they often rewrite imperfect text into more plausible forms, a flaw that clean‑text OCR benchmarks miss. The authors created FaithC4, a multilingual perturbation benchmark of 1,455 single‑page documents with scramble, random substitution, and visually similar substitution attacks, and evaluated 15 systems across general‑purpose VLMs, OCR‑specialized VLMs, and traditional OCR pipelines. Results reveal that general‑purpose VLMs suffer up to 6.9 WER points under perturbation, OCR‑specialized VLMs 0.1–3.4 points, and traditional OCR less than 0.8 points on English; probing Qwen3‑VL‑4B shows rewriting occurs only when a perturbed word’s final‑layer representation remains close to the original, with short words (4–6 characters) rewritten up to 10% of the time.
whyItMatters":"The findings highlight a critical limitation of VLMs in document transcription, underscoring the need for robust evaluation benchmarks that capture rewriting behavior beyond clean‑text accuracy."
By Gwang Gook Lee, Kenan Emir Ak, Jay Mohta, Yan Xu, Dimitrios Dimitriadis
The paper introduces an all‑in‑one multilingual scene text recognizer called ScriptMoE, which uses a script‑aware mixture‑of‑experts architecture to handle 10 scripts and 229 languages. It is built on a new large‑scale synthetic dataset, TextMuSS‑10M, and evaluated on the TextMuSS‑Bench, achieving 82.06% accuracy—1.31% higher than the best baseline. When integrated into the PP‑OCRv5 pipeline, ScriptMoE raises the end‑to‑end multilingual F1 score from 65.71% to 80.89%, slightly surpassing the best vision‑language model while using far fewer parameters.
By Xingsong Ye, Yongkun Du, Jiaxin Zhang, Zhixian Li, Chong Sun, Chen Li, Jing Lyu, Lianwen Jin, Zhineng Chen