arXiv:2605.27750v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Recent work has shown that Vision-Language Models (VLMs) used for optical character recognition (OCR) can generate plausible but visually uns...
By Antonia Karamolegkou, Nicolas Angleraud, Beno\^it Sagot, Thibault Cl\'erice
arXiv:2607. 03994v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern language models generally represent text as sequences of discrete token embeddings, an assumption deeply rooted in current practice but rarely questioned.
By Shuyang Xiang, Hao Guan
The paper reports that scene text recognition models, while achieving 89–97% accuracy on standard benchmarks, perform significantly worse on rare word–trigram combinations, with a 10–18 point drop in accuracy at the rare‑word/rare‑trigram corner across multiple languages and models. Scaling the vision backbone improves overall accuracy but does not alleviate this corner‑specific deficit. The authors identify the autoregressive decoder’s lexical prior as the root cause and show that architectural changes—specifically moving from autoregressive to CTC decoding—yield the largest improvement for these rare compositions.
By Genpei Zhang
The paper introduces a controlled benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on key‑value pair extraction from documents with varying levels of OCR noise. It tests 136 configurations across five instruction‑tuned open‑weight LLMs, three datasets, and four text‑quality conditions, using deterministic decoding to generate 17,688 document‑level inferences. The study finds that clean‑text performance does not reliably predict real‑world robustness, model rankings can reverse under noisy conditions, and few‑shot demonstrations do not always improve accuracy, highlighting reliability risks in OCR‑to‑LLM pipelines.
By Zahra Anvari
arXiv:2608.22366v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly being used for document understanding, yet their role in Arabic and Islamic manuscript recognition remai...
By Moshiur Farazi, Firoj Alam, Abderrahmane Maaradji, Zakaria Maamar, Hamdy Mubarak, Wajdi Zaghouani
The paper introduces an entity‑aware evaluation framework for OCR systems applied to historical documents, focusing on how well names, dates, and identifiers are preserved. Using a benchmark of 175 Berrutti Archive documents and 5,209 manually annotated entity mentions, the authors compare sequence‑recognition OCR, OCR‑specialized vision‑language models, and general‑purpose vision‑language models. Their results show that OCR rankings vary with the evaluation criterion: Qwen 3.6 achieves the highest entity coverage, while some systems recover many entities when small character‑level errors are tolerated, indicating that aggregate transcription metrics alone do not capture meaningful information preservation.
By Camilo Mari\~no (UDELAR, CB), Diego Belzarena (UDELAR, CB), Marina Gardella (CB), Ignacio Ram\'irez (UDELAR), Gregory Randall (UDELAR), Jean-Michel Morel (LU - Hong Kong)