The paper presents a large‑scale study of ragebait on Japanese X, developing an ensemble classifier trained on a dataset labeled with the help of a large language model. The detector was applied to a vast collection of Japanese posts, revealing that ragebait is especially common in politically and socially contentious topics such as politics, discrimination, public health, and interpersonal conflict. Ragebait posts spread more quickly and elicit stronger negative emotions—anger, fear, disgust, sadness, and surprise—than non‑ragebait posts.
By Zhiyang Qi, Kazuhiro Ito, Jinghui Chen, Hibiki Nakamura, Zhangxuan Chen, Erina Murata, Masaki Chujyo, Fujio Toriumi
arXiv:2610.20370v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Hate speech has become increasingly prevalent on social media, raising concerns about its detection, interpretation, and moderation. Persian, a relativ...
By Ghazal Kalhor, Sima Kamandloo, Mehrsa Shamsian, Behnam Bahrak
arXiv:2607. 14957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Online firestorms are rapid collective escalations of highly negative user-generated content and may cause substantial reputational and economic damage.
By Besim Shala, Peter Mandl, Andreas Humpe, Martin H\"ausl
The paper introduces WSF-ARG+, a new dataset that pairs hate speech with check‑worthiness annotations, and presents an LLM‑in‑the‑loop framework to streamline the annotation process. Experiments with 12 open‑weight large language models demonstrate that the framework cuts human effort while maintaining annotation quality. The study also shows that incorporating check‑worthiness labels improves hate‑speech detection performance, boosting macro‑F1 scores for large models by up to 0.213 and averaging 0.154 across models.
By Nicol\'as Benjam\'in Ocampo, Tommaso Caselli, Davide Ceolin
arXiv:2609.16393v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We introduce ParsHate, a manually annotated dataset of 10,000 Persian tweets spanning 2013-2022, representing the first decade-long benchmark for hate...
By Zahra Bokaei, Walid Magdy, Bonnie Webber
The paper presents a new benchmark for automatically evaluating mental health stigma in online text, featuring a fine‑grained taxonomy that covers stigma mode, domain, and specific components across multiple mental health conditions. The authors annotate naturally occurring news and social media posts and test large language models and classifiers for sentiment, toxicity, and hate speech, finding that these models poorly capture stigma and often overpredict it without explicit rules. The benchmark, annotations, exemplar cases, and code are publicly released on GitHub.
By Naomi Baes, Jemima Kang, Nick Haslam, Chris Groot, Alsa Wu, Luc Raszewski, Yulia Otmakhova
arXiv:2610.15795v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Automated moderation systems are deployed at scale, yet they remain opaque to the users and moderators affected by their decisions, and their coverag...
By Muhammad Shahid Iqbal Malik
The paper presents a new taxonomy for online harm on video platforms, expanding existing frameworks to multimodal contexts and defining six content-based categories: Information, Hate and harassment, Addictive, Clickbait, Sexual, and Physical harms. It also evaluates multimodal large language models (MLLMs) as alternative annotators, comparing GPT‑4‑Turbo, non‑trained crowdworkers, and trained human annotators on a dataset of 19,422 potentially harmful YouTube videos. The study finds that MLLMs can perform comparably to human annotators in both binary and multi‑label classification tasks, suggesting potential applications in content moderation and social science research.
By Claire Wonjeong Jo, Miki Weso{\l}owska, Magdalena Wojcieszak
arXiv:2606. 00046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video platforms such as YouTube have reshaped how users engage with entertainment and information, emphasizing brief, highly engaging content such as Shorts.
By Sydney Johns, Sanjeev Parthasarathy, Shantnu Bhalla, Vaibhav Garg
We introduce ParsHate, a manually annotated dataset of 10,000 Persian tweets spanning 2013-2022, representing the first decade-long benchmark for hate speech detection in Persian. The dataset contains...
arXiv:2601. 05232v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Most people now get their news from videos on social media, such as YouTube and Facebook, rather than through curated journalism.
By P. Gilda (Columbia University), P. Dungarwal (Columbia University), A. Thongkham (Columbia University), E. T. Ajayi (St John's University), S. Choudhary (Columbia University), T. M. Terol (Columbia University), C. Lam (Columbia University), J. P. Araujo (Columbia University), M. McFadyen-Mungalln (Columbia University), L. S. Liebovitch (Columbia University), P. T. Coleman (Columbia University), H. West (Columbia University), K. Sieck (Toyota Research Institute), S. Carter (Toyota Research Institute)
The study introduces a computational method to distinguish between antagonizing and criticizing rhetoric in political discourse on Twitter/X. Analyzing over 17 million tweets from German trending topics, it finds that roughly one‑third contain antagonizing rhetoric, which is more prevalent in trending discussions than in general Twitter traffic. Right‑leaning users use antagonizing language more than left‑leaning users, and both forms of rhetoric are amplified within political camps, with certain parties—AfD and the Greens—emerging as primary antagonists.
By Armin Pournaki, Eckehard Olbrich