The paper introduces WSF-ARG+, a new dataset that pairs hate speech with check‑worthiness annotations, and presents an LLM‑in‑the‑loop framework to streamline the annotation process. Experiments with 12 open‑weight large language models demonstrate that the framework cuts human effort while maintaining annotation quality. The study also shows that incorporating check‑worthiness labels improves hate‑speech detection performance, boosting macro‑F1 scores for large models by up to 0.213 and averaging 0.154 across models.
By Nicol\'as Benjam\'in Ocampo, Tommaso Caselli, Davide Ceolin
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) can exhibit stigma toward people with psychological conditions by examining their intermediate reasoning steps rather than just final answers. Using clinical expertise, the authors develop a framework to identify and rate stigmatizing language in LLM reasoning, distinguishing between overt prejudice and subtler biases. They also expand an existing mental health stigma benchmark to include more psychological conditions, finding that reasoning analysis reveals far more stigma than traditional multiple-choice evaluations and exposes flaws in the models’ logic and understanding of mental health.
By Sreehari Sankar, Aliakbar Nafar, Mona Barman, Hannah K. Heitz, Ashwin Kumar, Pouria Tohidi, Dailun Li, Danish Hussain, Russell DuBois, Hamed Hasheminia, Farshad Majzoubi
arXiv:2609.01548v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in advice seeking and decision making that may affect social judgements. Despite stigma's profound e...
By Stephanie Fong, Yiwen Jiang, Zimu Wang, Hongxi Yang, Yaling Shen, Hiu Weh Naomi Chow, Heung Ying Lai, Xiangyu Zhao, Qingyang Xu, Zhongxing Xu, Jiahe Liu, Guilherme C. Oliveira, Vincent Lee, Zongyuan Ge, Dominic Dwyer
arXiv:2502. 08266v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hate speech detection is a crucial task, especially on social media where harmful content can spread quickly.
By Somaiyeh Dehghan, Mehmet Umut Sen, Berrin Yanikoglu
The paper introduces a diagnostic tool for distinguishing the use of misogynistic slurs from their mention in counter‑speech within code‑mixed Hinglish. It identifies evaluation artifacts in existing corpora, releases a 416‑item minimal‑pair contrast set that decorrelates slur presence and gendered register from labels, and proposes a pair‑consistency metric to assess model performance. Experiments show that even strong baselines struggle to consistently label counter‑speech pairs, while a large language model achieves perfect scores, indicating the benchmark measures genuine capability rather than exploitation of artifacts.
By Ashanvi Yadav, Shubham Bhardwaj
The paper examines how four leading vision‑language models—LLaVA‑7B, Qwen‑VL, GPT‑4o mini, and Claude 3 Haiku—perform in detecting hateful content within memes. It evaluates the models under zero‑shot and few‑shot prompting, focusing not only on classification accuracy but also on the qualitative justifications they generate. The study highlights that these models often overlook contextual nuances, irony, and subtle cues essential for accurately identifying hate speech in memes.
By Muhammad Jawad Chowdhury, Adiba Hasan, Ishrak Hossain, Shahriar Ivan, Sabbir Ahmed