arXiv Machine Learning

Fast Organic Crystal Structure Prediction with Unit Cell Flow Matching

arXiv:2606. 03199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) is a requirement for computational modelling of organic solids, but traditionally costs several CPU-years per molecule.

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 9

Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models for Metal-Organic Frameworks Structure Prediction

arXiv:2601. 09285v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous crystalline materials with broad applications such as carbon capture and drug delivery, yet accurately predicting their 3D structures remains a significant challenge.

By Mianzhi Pan, JianFei Li, Peishuo Liu, Botian Wang, Yawen Ouyang, Yiming Rong, Hao Zhou, Jianbing Zhang

llms reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 7

FastCSP: Accelerated Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction with Universal Model for Atoms

arXiv:2508. 02641v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Molecular crystal structure prediction (CSP) is essential for applications in pharmaceuticals and organic electronics.

By Vahe Gharakhanyan, Yi Yang, Luis Barroso-Luque, Daniel S. Levine, Sushree Jagriti Sahoo, Brandon M. Wood, Kyle Michel, Muhammed Shuaibi, Gregory J. O. Beran, Viachaslau Bernat, Misko Dzamba, Xiang Fu, Meng Gao, Xingyu Liu, Benjamin K. Miller, Keian Noori, Lafe J. Purvis, Tingling Rao, Ammar Rizvi, Matt Uyttendaele, Andrew J. Ouderkirk, Chiara Daraio, C. Lawrence Zitnick, Arman Boromand, Noa Marom, Zachary W. Ulissi, Anuroop Sriram

fine-tuning efficiency

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 8

AtomBench: A Benchmarking Framework for Generative Crystal Reconstruction Models in Conventional Superconductors

arXiv:2510. 16165v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A key question in benchmarking generative crystal reconstruction models is how the amount and type of crystallographic information provided to a generative model affects its ability to reconstruct atomic structures.

By Charles Rhys Campbell, Aldo H. Romero, Kamal Choudhary

benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 2

Benchmark Dataset for Catalysis on 2D MXenes

arXiv:2606. 00794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Merging first-principles calculations with machine learning (ML), we aim to accelerate the exploration of catalytic behaviour in novel materials.

By Pavlo Melnyk, Anmar Karmush, M{\aa}rten Wadenb\"ack, Ania Beatriz Rodr\'iguez-Barrera, Johanna Rosen, Michael Felsberg, Jonas Bj\"ork

benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 31

APO: Unsupervised Atomic Policy Optimization for 3D Structure Prediction of Atomic Systems

arXiv:2607. 28553v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting the 3D structures of atomic systems is fundamental to advancing material science and drug discovery.

By Shentong Mo, Yatao Bian

benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Aug 10

ED-CSP: Crystal Structure Prediction from Electron Diffraction

arXiv:2608. 06448v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recovering a periodic 3D crystal structure from sparse, unindexed electron diffraction (ED) observations is a challenging generative inverse problem.

By Germain Poloudenny, Ya\"el Fr\'egier, Arnaud Demorti\`ere

benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 9

Few-step Cofolding with All-Atom Flow Maps

arXiv:2606. 08375v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: All-atom generative modeling of 3D biomolecular complexes has emerged as the dominant paradigm for predicting the structure of proteins and protein-ligand systems.

By Gianluca Scarpellini, Ron Shprints, Peter Holderrieth, Juno Nam, Pranav Murugan, Rafael G\'omez-Bombarelli, Tommi Jaakola, Maruan Al-Shedivat, Nicholas Matthew Boffi, Avishek Joey Bose

diffusion efficiency benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 7

NextCrystal: a Symmetry-Driven Generative Framework for Crystal Structure Prediction

arXiv:2602. 17176v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Crystal structure prediction (CSP), which aims to predict the 3D atomic arrangement of a crystal from its composition, is central to materials discovery and mechanistic understanding.

By Jinming Mu, Lixin He, Xudong Zhu, Shi Yin

llms diffusion benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 11

Open Materials Generation with Inference-Time Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2602. 00424v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continuous-time generative models for crystalline materials enable inverse materials design by learning to predict stable crystal structures, but incorporating explicit target properties into the generative process remains challenging.

By Philipp Hoellmer, Stefano Martiniani

reinforcement-learning

arXiv AI

Jul 1

Surrogate-Gated Generation and Foundation-Model Embeddings for Bayesian Materials Design

arXiv:2606. 28578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Closed-loop materials discovery iterates between proposing candidate structures and evaluating their properties, and property evaluation dominates the cost.

By Sk Md Ahnaf Akif Alvi, Jan Janssen, Danny Perez, Douglas Allaire, Raymundo Arroyave

rag diffusion reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 9

Accurate, Interdisciplinary and Transparent Structure-property Understanding with Deep Native Structural Reasoning

arXiv:2607. 07708v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structure-property relationships are foundational to biology, chemistry and materials science, where function, reactivity and physical response emerge from spatial, chemical and periodic organization.

By Chen Tang, Yizhou Wang, Jianyu Wu, Lintao Wang, Shixiang Tang, Pengze Li, Encheng Su, Jun Yao, Jiabei Xiao, Yuqi Shi, Jielan Li, Hongxia Hao, Zhangyang Gao, Fang Wu, Ben Fei, Xiangyu Yue, Pan Tan, Bozitao Zhong, Jinouwen Zhang, Aoran Wang, Yan Lu, Jiaheng Liu, Xinzhu Ma, Liang Hong, Mingyue Zheng, Phil Torr, Bowen Zhou, Wanli Ouyang, Lei Bai

llms multimodal benchmarks

Hugging Face Trending Papers

Jul 8

Accurate, Interdisciplinary and Transparent Structure-property Understanding with Deep Native Structural Reasoning

Structure-property relationships are foundational to biology, chemistry and materials science, where function, reactivity and physical response emerge from spatial, chemical and periodic organization. Mechanistically explaining these relationships requires interpreting structural evidence through scientific principles and physical constraints, from stereochemistry and bonding to symmetry, energetics and periodic order.

llms multimodal benchmarks

Related stories