arXiv:2505. 12650v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reconstructing atomistic crystal structures from a single noisy STEM projection is an ill-posed inverse problem: multiple lattices can explain similar contrast, and purely feed-forward models cannot verify physical validity.
By Yaotian Yang, Yiwen Tang, Yizhe Chen, Xiao Chen, Jiangjie Qiu, Hao Xiong, Haoyu Yin, Zhiyao Luo, Yifei Zhang, Sijia Tao, Wentao Li, Qinghua Zhang, Yuqiang Li, Wanli Ouyang, Bin Zhao, Xiaonan Wang, Fei Wei
arXiv:2606. 31332v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Protein automodeling from cryo-EM density maps faces unique challenges in enforcing physicochemical validity and managing conformational heterogeneity.
By Minzhang Li, Mingrui Li, Weichen Qin, Qihe Chen, Sixian Shen, Yuan Pei, Jiakai Zhang, Jingyi Yu
The study benchmarks 12 deep generative crystal structure prediction models against the template-based TCSP 2.0 on 180 test structures, finding that template retrieval achieves the highest top‑1 success (68.3%). Most generative predictions overlap with template substitutions, and removing entire stoichiometric prototype families from training reduces accuracy by 50‑78%, indicating strong prototype dependence. Only a small subset of predictions remain after such removal, suggesting limited genuine de‑novo capability.
By Lai Wei, Rongzhi Dong, Ying Feng, Madeline Miklos, Jianjun Hu
arXiv:2608. 06448v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recovering a periodic 3D crystal structure from sparse, unindexed electron diffraction (ED) observations is a challenging generative inverse problem.
By Germain Poloudenny, Ya\"el Fr\'egier, Arnaud Demorti\`ere
arXiv:2606. 03199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) is a requirement for computational modelling of organic solids, but traditionally costs several CPU-years per molecule.
By Alston Lo, Luka Mucko, Austin H. Cheng, Andy Cai, Alastair J. A. Price, Wojciech Matusik, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik
The paper introduces CrystAF, an all‑atom crystal flow‑map generation model, and evaluates where physics should be incorporated into generative crystal structure models. By applying physics‑informed post‑training, the authors improve molecular validity and crystal packing without altering sampling speed, while inference‑time corrections further refine the structures. The study demonstrates that post‑training and inference‑time physics are complementary, and that the post‑training approach transfers to other generators such as Clari‑M and MolCrystalFlow.
By Haocheng Tang, Junmei Wang, Wengong Jin