arXiv:2609.39773v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Crystal structure governs material properties, making crystal structure prediction (CSP) a fundamental problem in materials science. Generative models...
By Thomas Egg, Harry Winston Sullivan, Maya M. Martirossyan, Philipp H\"ollmer, Cheng Zeng, Adrian Roitberg, Mingjie Liu, Richard Hennig, Sapna Sarupria, Ellad B. Tadmor, Stefano Martiniani
arXiv:2606. 29459v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inverse design of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) requires searching a combinatorially vast space where property labels are expensive and most machine-learning models reveal little about why a structure succeeds.
By Kyungmin Nam, Seunghee Han, Jihan Kim
arXiv:2608. 11283v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computation-ready metal-organic framework (MOF) databases are essential for high-throughput screening, yet many reported crystal structures remain chemically unreasonable or disordered, compromising simulation fidelity.
By Guobin Zhao, Xiao-Yan Li
arXiv:2606. 07712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Progress in AI-driven crystal materials science has so far been carried by narrow architectures purpose-built for individual tasks -- graph neural networks for property prediction, diffusion and flow-matching models for crystal generation -- each excelling within its niche yet unable to act as a shared backbone across the full spectrum of materials problems.
By Zhan'ao Yao, Boxuan Zhang, Jingyuan Shu, Xiaoyu Wu, Rongyan Wang, Linjing Li, Dajun Zeng, Yudong Yao, Tingwei Chen, Youwei Wang, Xiaolin Zhao, Jiahui Shi, Jianjun Liu
arXiv:2606. 03199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) is a requirement for computational modelling of organic solids, but traditionally costs several CPU-years per molecule.
By Alston Lo, Luka Mucko, Austin H. Cheng, Andy Cai, Alastair J. A. Price, Wojciech Matusik, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik
Molecular crystal structure prediction (CSP) is important in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and organic electronics, where subtle differences in molecular conformation and packing can strongly affect...
The study benchmarks 12 deep generative crystal structure prediction models against the template-based TCSP 2.0 on 180 test structures, finding that template retrieval achieves the highest top‑1 success (68.3%). Most generative predictions overlap with template substitutions, and removing entire stoichiometric prototype families from training reduces accuracy by 50‑78%, indicating strong prototype dependence. Only a small subset of predictions remain after such removal, suggesting limited genuine de‑novo capability.
By Lai Wei, Rongzhi Dong, Ying Feng, Madeline Miklos, Jianjun Hu
arXiv:2607. 28553v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting the 3D structures of atomic systems is fundamental to advancing material science and drug discovery.
By Shentong Mo, Yatao Bian
arXiv:2608. 06582v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow-based generative models can efficiently produce candidate structures for crystal structure prediction (CSP), but their pretrained objectives do not directly optimize downstream target recovery.
By Kaixiang Su, Hongfei Xue, Qiang Zhu
arXiv:2609.37158v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Generative models for crystals enable the discovery of novel structures, but scaling all-atom generation to larger systems such as metal--organic frame...
By Hendrik Kra{\ss}, Seyed Mohamad Moosavi, Mathias Niepert
Packora is a flow-based generative model designed for molecular crystal structure prediction (CSP). It jointly predicts atomic coordinates and lattice parameters from molecular graphs, supporting multi-component and organometallic crystals and allowing conditioning on conformers, stereochemistry, and space-group data. In evaluations inspired by the CCDC CSP blind test, Packora outperforms baselines on generation and ranking benchmarks, achieving superior matched-budget coverage, higher experimental-form recovery, lower ranks, and faster convergence.
By Nayoung Kim, Kiyoung Seong, Sungsoo Ahn
arXiv:2602. 00424v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continuous-time generative models for crystalline materials enable inverse materials design by learning to predict stable crystal structures, but incorporating explicit target properties into the generative process remains challenging.
By Philipp Hoellmer, Stefano Martiniani