arXiv Computer Vision

Early versus Late RGB-Infrared Fusion for Counter-UAV Detection: A Comparative Study

This study compares two fusion strategies for UAV detection using RGB and infrared imagery: early (image-level) fusion and late (decision-level) fusion. Extensive testing in varied lighting, backgrounds, distances, altitudes, and zoom levels shows that early fusion yields higher raw performance by integrating thermal data from the start, while late fusion offers a flexible workflow useful when sensors or frames are misaligned. The paper discusses both strengths and weaknesses of each approach and provides practical implementation recommendations.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 2

Multimodal RGB-Infrared Combination for UAV-Based Wildfire Segmentation: A Comparative Study on FLAME3

The paper examines RGB‑infrared fusion for binary wildfire segmentation using UAV imagery on the FLAME3 dataset. It compares RGB and infrared baselines with three fusion strategies across U‑Net, DeepLabV3+, and SegFormer architectures. Results show thermal data dominates segmentation performance, and feature‑level fusion with transformer‑based models yields the best results.

By Matheus F. Kovaleski, Lu\'is Garrote, Cristiano Premebida, J\'er\^ome Mendes, Jo\~ao Ruivo Paulo
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 25

FoCal: Frequency-Oriented Cross-Modal Interaction and Spectral Calibration for Aerial Visible-Infrared Object Detection

FoCal is a new frequency‑oriented framework for aerial RGB–IR object detection that explicitly models cross‑modal interaction across different frequency components. It introduces a Frequency‑Aware Dual‑Domain Calibration module to consolidate low‑frequency structural cues while preserving high‑frequency modality‑specific details, and a Discrepancy‑Guided Spectral Modulation module that adaptively enhances, preserves, or attenuates the joint spectrum based on confidence‑weighted amplitude discrepancies. Experiments on DroneVehicle, ESCVehicle, and ATR‑UMOD show FoCal achieving high mAP scores (83.5%, 54.8%, 64.6%) with only 3.0 M parameters and 113.6 FPS, demonstrating a strong accuracy–efficiency trade‑off.

By Ben Liang, Chao Sui, Junqi Bai, Yuan Liu, Chunlai Li, Xiubao Sui, Qian Chen
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

UAV Thermal Imagery for Inert Ordnance Screening: Multi Campaign Dataset Development,Object Detection, and Practical Recommendations

The paper presents a multi‑campaign UAV thermal image dataset for inert ordnance screening, comprising 5,855 labeled image pairs collected in Tennessee across diverse terrains and seasons. The authors trained YOLOV11l and RT‑DETR‑R50 models on 33 m and 15 m altitude data, achieving automated candidate detection, and provided practical guidelines for future humanitarian mine action surveys. The dataset and models aim to aid screening and prioritization for follow‑up technical surveys or EOD assessment, not to replace clearance operations.

By Chad Melton, PhD., Annabelle Kelton
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

RGB-to-IR image translation for infrared vehicle detection in unseen UAV domains

The paper explores using generative models to translate RGB UAV images into synthetic infrared (IR) images for training vehicle detectors in domains where real IR data is scarce. Various translators—supervised GANs, ControlNet-based diffusion models, and LoRA-ed foundation models—were trained on paired RGB-IR datasets and applied to unseen target datasets to generate synthetic IR data. The synthetic IR images, especially those produced by Stable Diffusion 3.5 with ControlNet, significantly improved detection performance on unseen IR test sets, outperforming RGB and grayscale baselines and narrowing the gap to real IR data.

By Thijs A. Eker, Ella P. Fokkinga, Jan Erik van Woerden, Elfi I. S. Hofmeijer, Sebastiaan P. Snel, Klamer Schutte, Friso G. Heslinga
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 2

The Impact of Processing Parameters on High-Accuracy Measurements in UAV Photogrammetry

The paper investigates how processing parameters affect the accuracy of UAV photogrammetry. By testing 768 processing variants on ten datasets over 1.5 years, the study finds that the best configuration yields an RMSE of 16 mm, while the worst reaches 303 mm. Key factors include the number of ground control points, camera calibration corrections, and the use of Post‑Processing Kinematic GNSS for camera center determination, which together reduce systematic errors by more than half.

By Pawe{\l} \'Cwi\k{a}ka{\l}a, Edyta Puniach, El\.zbieta Pastucha, Wojciech Gruszczy\'nski