arXiv Computer Vision By Pawe{\l} \'Cwi\k{a}ka{\l}a, Edyta Puniach, El\.zbieta Pastucha, Wojciech Gruszczy\'nski

The Impact of Processing Parameters on High-Accuracy Measurements in UAV Photogrammetry

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The paper investigates how processing parameters affect the accuracy of UAV photogrammetry. By testing 768 processing variants on ten datasets over 1.5 years, the study finds that the best configuration yields an RMSE of 16 mm, while the worst reaches 303 mm. Key factors include the number of ground control points, camera calibration corrections, and the use of Post‑Processing Kinematic GNSS for camera center determination, which together reduce systematic errors by more than half.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

Camera Calibration Using Inaccurate and Asynchronous Discrete GPS Trajectory from Drones

The paper tackles the problem of calibrating a stationary camera’s yaw, pitch, and roll using a drone’s GPS trajectory, which suffers from altitude bias, time offset, and discrete sampling. It formulates a parameter estimation problem that jointly estimates the GPS altitude bias, time offset, and camera orientation biases, and proposes a maximum likelihood estimator based on Iterated Least Squares to handle the asynchronous, discrete GPS data. Simulation results show the estimator achieves accuracy close to the Cramér–Rao Lower Bound, with a recommended drone trajectory yielding calibration errors within 14% of the measurement error standard deviation.

By R. Yang, Y. Bar-Shalom, H. A. J. Huang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 10

UAV3DCrop: Benchmarking 3D Reconstruction in Repeated Multi-Angle UAV Crop Surveys

arXiv:2608. 06404v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate 3D crop monitoring underpins data-driven precision agriculture by enabling field-scale analysis of plant structure, growth dynamics, and management response.

By Junxiong Zhou, Xuechen Li, Chonghao Qiu, Lang Qiao, Xiaowei Jia, Qi Yang, Chishan Zhang, Leikun Yin, Nanshan You, Vipin Kumar, David Mulla, Ce Yang, Zhenong Jin, Licheng Liu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

UAV Thermal Imagery for Inert Ordnance Screening: Multi Campaign Dataset Development,Object Detection, and Practical Recommendations

The paper presents a multi‑campaign UAV thermal image dataset for inert ordnance screening, comprising 5,855 labeled image pairs collected in Tennessee across diverse terrains and seasons. The authors trained YOLOV11l and RT‑DETR‑R50 models on 33 m and 15 m altitude data, achieving automated candidate detection, and provided practical guidelines for future humanitarian mine action surveys. The dataset and models aim to aid screening and prioritization for follow‑up technical surveys or EOD assessment, not to replace clearance operations.

By Chad Melton, PhD., Annabelle Kelton
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

A Lightweight Multi-Metric No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Framework for UAV Imaging

The paper presents MM‑IQA, a lightweight no‑reference image quality assessment framework designed for UAV imaging. It fuses interpretable metrics—blur, edge structure, low‑resolution artifacts, exposure imbalance, noise, haze, and frequency content—to output a single quality score between 0 and 100. Evaluated on five benchmark datasets, MM‑IQA achieved SRCC values from 0.647 to 0.830 and runs in about 1.97 s per image with modest memory usage.

By Koffi Titus Sergio Aglin, Anthony K. Muchiri, Celestin Nkundineza