The study investigates whether a curated same-family neural network experiment can guide large language model (LLM)-based improvements for a low-performing target model under equal generation and evaluation budgets. Using TuneNNGen, an extension of NNGPT, the authors compare source-guided generation with target-only generation on CIFAR-10, SVHN, Imagenette, and CIFAR-100 datasets, achieving significant accuracy gains across these benchmarks. The results demonstrate that the benefits depend on source-target compatibility and LLM adaptation, rather than merely on stored source accuracy.
arXiv:2607. 05704v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can generate neural-network modifications, but unrestricted generation is often invalid or harmful.
LESS (Lightweight Evolutionary Supernet Search) is a data‑driven NAS method that uses a brief hard‑path warm‑up and CMA‑ES to evaluate candidate architectures as decoded hard genotypes after six supernet updates. On NAS‑Bench‑201, LESS attains 93.189 % CIFAR‑10 accuracy in just 409.1 seconds, nearly matching FairNAS while using only about 1/24 of its search time. The approach also transfers well to CIFAR‑100, ImageNet16‑120, and the larger DARTS space, achieving high accuracies with searches completed in roughly 43.5 minutes on a single GPU.
arXiv:2609.01244v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every supervised fine-tuning run forces the same chain of decisions, such as learning rate, batch size, LoRA or full fine-tuning, how many epochs, whic...
arXiv:2607. 01984v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Newer lightweight convolutional neural networks are often presented as improving predictive performance and deployment efficiency, but such claims require controlled evaluation.
The study investigates whether switching optimizers between pretraining and subsequent training stages of large language models (LLMs) incurs a performance penalty. By pretraining 1.2B Llama‑3 models with varying proportions of AdamW and Muon updates, and interpolating between the two during continued pretraining and supervised fine‑tuning (SFT), the authors find little evidence of a meaningful optimizer mismatch penalty. The results show that final performance is largely determined by the independent effects of the pretraining and post‑training optimizers, with downstream performance generally improving as the proportion of Muon updates during SFT increases, and that Muon remains competitive with AdamW even for task‑general SFT on larger models.
Every supervised fine-tuning run forces the same chain of decisions, such as learning rate, batch size, LoRA or full fine-tuning, how many epochs, which optimiser, and what data to feed the model. Eac...
Data-DPO is a target model‑oriented supervised fine‑tuning data selection method that uses one‑step probing of the target model to generate pairwise data preferences, trains a lightweight reward model to capture these preferences, and then selects a training subset by combining target‑model preference, external quality scores, and marginal diversity. Experiments on Vision‑Flan and LLaVA‑CoT demonstrate that Data‑DPO consistently outperforms existing data selection baselines across multiple data budgets and even surpasses full data training performance.
Introduce a MinHash-based similarity scheduling framework that constructs a progressive curriculum over neural architecture code for LLM-based neural architecture search (NAS). Using 128-permutation MinHash signatures over normalised 7-gram source code shingles, we partition the reference pool into similarity bands and present them in increasing architectural heterogeneity, with the best LoRA adapter from each stage merged cumulatively into the backbone.
The study evaluates 16 AI‑generated image detection methods in a zero‑shot setting, testing 23 pretrained variants on 12 datasets with 2.6 million images from 291 generators. Results show no single detector consistently outperforms others, with accuracy ranging from 37.5 % to 75.0 %. The study highlights that training data alignment and generator type significantly affect performance, especially against modern commercial models, and identifies systematic failure patterns across datasets.
arXiv:2608. 09091v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transfer learning is particularly useful in settings with limited training data, and within image classification it is common to transfer learn upon massive datasets like ImageNet , CIFAR-100, or COCO .
arXiv:2609.36655v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual test-time adaptation (CTTA) adapts a source model to an unlabeled test stream whose distribution may change over time. Existing TTA methods o...
arXiv:2607. 17467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Few-shot Test-Time Domain Adaptation (FSTT-DA) seeks to adapt models to novel domains using only a handful of unlabeled target samples.