arXiv Machine Learning

Hierarchical Clustering Can Jointly Satisfy Richness, Consistency, and Scale Invariance

The paper investigates whether the three axioms of scale invariance, richness, and consistency—known to be mutually exclusive for flat clustering—can be jointly satisfied by hierarchical clustering. It demonstrates that, unlike the flat case, there exist uncountably many hierarchical clustering methods that meet all three axioms, termed admissible methods. The authors construct several such methods, explore a refinement partial order among them, and show that while the set of admissible methods is diverse, every admissible method shares a common backbone of well‑separated clusters.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 10

Hierarchical Clustering Can Jointly Satisfy Richness, Consistency, and Scale Invariance

The paper investigates whether the impossibility results for flat clustering—specifically Kleinberg’s axioms of scale invariance, richness, and consistency—extend to hierarchical clustering. It demonstrates that, unlike the flat case, there exist uncountably many hierarchical clustering methods that satisfy all three axioms, termed admissible methods. The authors construct several such methods, explore a refinement partial order among them, and show that while the set of admissible methods is diverse, every method shares a common backbone of well‑separated clusters.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14

Hierarchical $\mathcal{F}$-Clustering: Approximation and Hardness of Clustering into Trees and Bounded Diameter Graphs

Consider the following variation on the Hierarchical Clustering problem: Usually, while building a hierarchical clustering, one recursively partitions the data until each cluster becomes a singleton. We relax the halting condition of the recursive process to stop whenever the remaining cluster is a graph belonging to a class $\mathcal{F}$.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Byzantine Accountability Without Consensus: Strong Eventual Consistency for Non-Associative, Stochastic, Robust Aggregation

arXiv:2607. 10305v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Byzantine-robust aggregation rules such as multi-Krum assume a central coordinator, and decentralising them is obstructed by the rules themselves: they are globally coupled, non-associative, and discontinuous, so an ulpscale perturbation can flip the selected subset, moving the output by a non-vanishing amount.

By Ryan Gillespie
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Individual Fairness in Hierarchical Clustering

The paper investigates hierarchical clustering under an individual fairness constraint that limits relative distortion within local k‑nearest neighborhoods. It formulates this as a feasibility problem over dominated ultrametrics, characterizes the minimal multiplicative slack needed, identifies a sharp local threshold, proves stability under bounded perturbations, establishes monotonicity in k, and demonstrates a Θ(log n) separation between local and global realizability. Experiments on synthetic and real‑world datasets corroborate the theoretical findings.

By Binita Maity, Shrutimoy Das
arXiv AI
1d ago

Universal NP-Hardness of Clustering under General Utilities

The paper introduces the Universal Clustering Problem (UCP), a framework that captures the optimisation core common to many clustering methods by maximizing a polynomial‑time computable partition utility over a finite metric space. It proves UCP is NP‑hard through reductions from graph colouring and exact cover by 3‑sets, showing that popular algorithms such as k‑means, GMMs, DBSCAN, spectral clustering, and affinity propagation inherit this intractability. The authors argue that this unified hardness explains typical failure modes—like local optima and greedy merge traps—and suggest moving toward stability‑aware objectives and interaction‑driven formulations with explicit guarantees.

By Angshul Majumdar