arXiv:2606. 18972v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Extracting a flat clustering solution from a hierarchy is a common task in practical cluster analysis and can be formulated as an optimisation problem.
By Connor Simpson, Ricardo J. G. B. Campello
arXiv:2607. 13217v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Consider the following variation on the Hierarchical Clustering problem: Usually, while building a hierarchical clustering, one recursively partitions the data until each cluster becomes a singleton.
By Micha{\l} Szyfelbein, Dariusz Dereniowski
Consider the following variation on the Hierarchical Clustering problem: Usually, while building a hierarchical clustering, one recursively partitions the data until each cluster becomes a singleton. We relax the halting condition of the recursive process to stop whenever the remaining cluster is a graph belonging to a class $\mathcal{F}$.
arXiv:2604. 23628v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hierarchical clustering is a fundamental task in data analysis, but classical methods have long lacked a principled objective function.
By Ryuki Tsukuba, Kazutoshi Ando
arXiv:2502. 08397v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Clustering is a fundamental technique in data analysis and machine learning, used to group similar data points together.
By Anna Livia Croella, Veronica Piccialli, Antonio M. Sudoso
arXiv:2609. 30477v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exact Euclidean \(K\)-means partitions \(n\) observations into \(K\) unlabelled clusters, but the unrestricted search is generally exponential.
By Yordan P. Raykov, Max A. Little
The paper introduces the Universal Clustering Problem (UCP), a framework that captures the optimisation core common to many clustering methods by maximizing a polynomial‑time computable partition utility over a finite metric space. It proves UCP is NP‑hard through reductions from graph colouring and exact cover by 3‑sets, showing that popular algorithms such as k‑means, GMMs, DBSCAN, spectral clustering, and affinity propagation inherit this intractability. The authors argue that this unified hardness explains typical failure modes—like local optima and greedy merge traps—and suggest moving toward stability‑aware objectives and interaction‑driven formulations with explicit guarantees.
By Angshul Majumdar
arXiv:2607. 24237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many existing clustering methods are designed based on a set-oriented definition---a cluster is a set of similar points---relying a point-to-point similarity function to find similar points.
By Kai Ming Ting, Kaifeng Zhang, Sanjay Chawla
arXiv:2606. 01525v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Semi-supervised hierarchical clustering aims to learn a tree structure consistent with data patterns and user-provided supervision.
By Junjing Zheng, Xinyu Zhang, Xiangfeng Qiu, Chengliang Song, Weidong Jiang
arXiv:2411. 01576v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The explainable clustering problem was first posed by Moshkovitz et al.
By Maximilian Fleissner, Maedeh Zarvandi, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar
arXiv:2607. 19704v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scaling LLM-based applications to millions of users is bottlenecked by the inference cost and latency of modern foundation models.
By Longshaokan Wang, Wai Tsang Keung, Punit Ghodasara, Roman Wang, Ali Dashti, Francesc Moreno-Noguer
The paper introduces ICOMT, a framework for interpretable clustering using optimal multi-way decision trees. It proposes a new discretization technique based on one-dimensional K‑means, formulates a binary linear optimization problem to ensure tree optimality, and demonstrates superior clustering accuracy and shallow tree structures on four public datasets.
By Hayato Suzuki, Shunnosuke Ikeda, Naoki Nishimura, Yuichi Takano