arXiv AI

Playing Games with My Heart: An Evaluation of AI Companion Apps

arXiv:2605. 08093v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The use of chatbots for various forms of companionship is growing rapidly, raising a myriad of questions about simulated relationships, emotional dependence, and psychological harm.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

A Responsive Present, a Shared Past, a Social Other: Teens' Overreliance on Companion AI Chatbots

The study examines how teens interact with companion AI chatbots, revealing that these systems offer comfort, recognition, identity exploration, and relationship rehearsal. However, teens also experience problematic attachment, social substitution, emotional dependence, and disruptions to academic and social life. The findings highlight the need for safety measures that address long‑term relationships, user‑controlled memory, privacy, relational boundaries, and healthy disengagement.

By Mohammad Namvarpour (Matt), Tyler Chang, Afsaneh Razi
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Personalizing Personal Health Interfaces: Co-Design with Generative AI

The paper explores how generative AI can lower the barrier to personalizing health dashboards by enabling users to co-design interfaces in Figma Make. In a study with 14 participants, redesigns of Google and Apple Health focused on personal context, future planning, and interactive experiences, though conversational AI designs tended toward chat-window conventions. AI facilitated the materialization of loosely articulated ideas, yet model defaults and generation latency influenced iteration, and the process highlighted interpretability and accountability over privacy, trust, and emotional safety.

By Karthik S. Bhat, Vidhi Shah, Vedika Agnihotri, Dong Whi Yoo, Koustuv Saha
arXiv AI
Jun 24

AI Fiction in the Wild

arXiv:2606. 22748v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Some professional authors are beginning to use AI tools to help produce their fiction writing.

By Neel Gupta, Maria Antoniak, Melanie Walsh
arXiv AI
Sep 25

How Do Users Negotiate Harmful Value Conflicts with AI Companions? A Study with Minion, a Technology Probe for In-Situ Human-AI Conflict Response

The paper examines how users handle harmful value conflicts with AI companions. By analyzing 146 posts and conducting a week-long study with 22 participants using the Minion technology probe, the authors find that users blend softer and harder strategies, especially when conflicts involve Universalism and Tradition values. The study highlights that such conflicts create asymmetric responsibility, with users shouldering unilateral repair work that AI companions cannot reciprocate, suggesting a need for platform-level safeguards.

By Qing Xiao, Xianzhe Fan, Xuhui Zhou, Yuran Su, Zhicong Lu, Maarten Sap, Hong Shen