The paper introduces a style-aware paraphrasing method for text anonymization that leverages pretrained large language models to build compact stylistic profiles from minimal samples and rewrite text to suppress identifiable style markers while preserving meaning. It demonstrates that this approach reduces authorship attribution F1 scores by 60‑70% on blog and review datasets, outperforming both differential privacy‑based and non‑DP baselines, and maintains content quality and readability.
arXiv:2609.22112v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate user-specific text with high stylistic fidelity. However, the personal data that...
arXiv:2608.22161v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Online users often release multiple texts under the same identity, giving attackers an author profile that can reveal more than any single text. Existi...
arXiv:2601. 04641v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The deployment of Machine-Generated Text (MGT) detection systems necessitates processing sensitive user data, creating a fundamental conflict between authorship verification and privacy preservation.
The paper "Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions" examines the difficulties of assessing text that is tailored to individual users’ styles. It critiques common metrics such as BLEU, embeddings, and LLM-as-judges, and introduces a style discrimination benchmark covering domain discrimination, authorship attribution, and LLM-generated personalized versus non-personalized discrimination across eight writing tasks. The study finds that ensembles of diverse evaluation metrics outperform single-evaluator approaches and offers guidance for reliable assessment of style-personalized generation.
arXiv:2505. 14608v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite considerable progress in the development of machine-text detectors, the ease with which machine-text can be manipulated to evade detection has led to suggestions that the problem is inherently intractable.
The paper introduces a new authorship attribution model that represents each author with multiple consistent but distinct writing styles, rather than a single style profile. Experiments across four scenarios—audience size, temporal distance, preceding context, and genre norms—show that authors vary significantly in how idiolectic their writing is, and that certain settings yield text that is more informative about authorship. The authors demonstrate that modeling multiple styles per author leads to significant performance improvements over traditional single-style approaches.
arXiv:2606. 10099v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about misuse such as plagiarism, misinformation, and automated influence operations, motivating the need for robust detectors.
DP-IPI introduces a hybrid differential privacy text rewriting mechanism that selectively privatizes only the spans containing indirect personal identifiers (IPIs) in clinical texts. By targeting these specific tokens rather than all words, the method preserves higher text quality and usability while still reducing re-identification risks. The approach demonstrates improved privacy‑utility trade‑offs compared to indiscriminate DP text rewriting techniques.
The paper introduces FAVoR, a method for federated personalized generation that mitigates author‑style homogenization caused by standard aggregation in parameter‑efficient fine‑tuning. Using the BlogText benchmark and ASCE diagnostics, the authors show that common federated PEFT baselines preserve semantic utility but blur author‑specific style. FAVoR employs a shared‑private adapter design, where clients upload shared updates while keeping author‑specific residual corrections locally, leading to improved style retention with minimal utility loss.
arXiv:2510.13302v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Computational stylometry studies writing style through quantitative textual patterns, enabling applications such as authorship attribution, i...
The paper introduces ATLAS, a likelihood‑based method for model authorship attribution (MAA) that learns how each source family generates text and attributes new text by comparing token‑level likelihoods. It also presents MAABench, a benchmark for evaluating MAA under out‑of‑distribution scenarios such as unseen domains and future model versions. Experiments show ATLAS outperforms existing baselines, achieving 74.27% accuracy on the hardest MAABench setting and correctly identifying teacher models in distillation experiments.
SpeechLLMs used in professional settings often undergo domain customisation through prompts or fine‑tuning, which can inadvertently cause the model to transcribe phonetically similar words from its context or training data, leaking private information. The authors systematically investigate this overlooked privacy risk, creating benchmarks to measure leakage rates for both prompting and fine‑tuning, and find that both mechanisms cause measurable leakage that compounds when combined. They evaluate a prompt‑level mitigation strategy and analyse the accuracy‑leakage trade‑off, concluding that fine‑tuning without context prompts offers the best balance between performance and privacy.