AuthorMix is a lightweight, modular framework for authorship style transfer that uses layer‑wise adapter mixing. It trains individual style‑specific LoRA adapters on a small set of high‑resource authors, enabling rapid adaptation to new target styles with only a few examples. The method achieves the highest combined style‑meaning score among baselines, including GPT‑5.1, and improves meaning preservation, as confirmed by human evaluation.
By Sarubi Thillainathan, Ji-Ung Lee, Michael Sullivan, Alexander Koller
The paper introduces ATLAS, a likelihood‑based method for model authorship attribution (MAA) that learns how each source family generates text and attributes new text by comparing token‑level likelihoods. It also presents MAABench, a benchmark for evaluating MAA under out‑of‑distribution scenarios such as unseen domains and future model versions. Experiments show ATLAS outperforms existing baselines, achieving 74.27% accuracy on the hardest MAABench setting and correctly identifying teacher models in distillation experiments.
By Minseok Ko, Hyunseok Lee, Woomin Song, Beomjun Kim, Jinwoo Shin, Kunwoong Kim
arXiv:2508. 01656v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) have reached human-like fluency and coherence, distinguishing machine-generated text (MGT) from human-written content becomes increasingly difficult.
By Lucio La Cava, Dominik Macko, R\'obert M\'oro, Ivan Srba, Andrea Tagarelli
Authorship verification (AV) assumes that an author's writing style remains sufficiently stable to distinguish it from that of other writers. In practice, however, this assumption is challenged by dis...
arXiv:2606. 10099v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about misuse such as plagiarism, misinformation, and automated influence operations, motivating the need for robust detectors.
By Rafael Rivera Soto, Barry Chen, Nicholas Andrews
The paper "Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions" examines the difficulties of assessing text that is tailored to individual users’ styles. It critiques common metrics such as BLEU, embeddings, and LLM-as-judges, and introduces a style discrimination benchmark covering domain discrimination, authorship attribution, and LLM-generated personalized versus non-personalized discrimination across eight writing tasks. The study finds that ensembles of diverse evaluation metrics outperform single-evaluator approaches and offers guidance for reliable assessment of style-personalized generation.
By Anubhav Jangra, Bahareh Sarrafzadeh, Silviu Cucerzan, Adrian de Wynter, Sujay Kumar Jauhar
arXiv:2606. 04928v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse applications, raising critical questions for governance, accountability, and data provenance.
By Fr\'ed\'eric Berdoz, Luca A. Lanzend\"orfer, Kaan Bayraktar, Roger Wattenhofer
The paper examines how different author representations affect zero‑shot authorship attribution (AA). It compares a label‑only prompting baseline with three strategies: representative writing samples, LLM‑generated descriptions, and style embeddings (LISA). The study finds that incorporating author‑specific representations improves performance, with a two‑stage LISA framework achieving the best results, while LLM‑generated descriptions offer a more compact but slightly less accurate alternative.
By Nudrat Habib, Tosin Adewumi, Sana Sabah Al-Azzawi, Marcus Liwicki, Elisa Barney
MultiGhostBench is a multilingual benchmark for authorship attribution of long‑form text generated by large language models. It contains 928 books produced by five recent LLMs in six languages and three scripts, each averaging about 59,000 words, and is designed to test attribution methods under domain, author, and language shifts. Experiments show that no single attribution method dominates across all settings, with performance generally dropping under distribution shifts, while transformer‑based detectors retain generator information across languages but vary in transfer effectiveness, and statistical/fingerprint detectors are more language‑dependent.
MultiGhostBench is a multilingual benchmark for authorship attribution of long-form text generated by large language models. It contains 928 books produced by five recent LLMs in six languages and three scripts, each averaging about 59,000 words, and is designed to test attribution methods under domain, author, and language shifts. Experiments show that no single attribution method dominates across all settings, with performance generally dropping under distribution shifts, and that transformer-based detectors retain generator information across languages while statistical and fingerprint-based detectors are more language‑dependent.
By Matteo Greco, Anudeex Shetty, Andrea Tagarelli, Jey Han Lau
The paper investigates how stylistic changes introduced by large language models (LLMs) affect multimodal claim verification, a task that determines whether a textual claim is supported by given evidence. Two rewriting strategies are used: natural rewriting, mimicking typical academic polishing, and controlled injection, adding a single LLM-associated word. Across 11 open‑weight models (2B–38B parameters) from five VLM families, the study finds that most models remain robust to these modifications, showing no significant accuracy drop, though consistent probability shifts—especially under hedging conditions—are observed.
By Yun-Ang Wu, Xanh Ho, Andre Greiner-Petter, Sunisth Kumar, Tian Cheng Xia, Florian Boudin, Akiko Aizawa
The rise of human-AI collaborative writing has created a growing need for fine-grained detection methods that support localizing likely LLM-generated content in mixed-authorship documents. Existing methods for detecting LLM-generated text mainly focus on document-level classification and cannot identify which parts of the text are generated by LLMs.