arXiv Computation and Language By Omkar Yadav, Michael Jiang, Kenan Alkiek, Jian Zhu, David Jurgens

Consistent yet Contextual: Learning Author-Level Mixtures of Style for Authorship Attribution

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces a new authorship attribution model that represents each author with multiple consistent but distinct writing styles, rather than a single style profile. Experiments across four scenarios—audience size, temporal distance, preceding context, and genre norms—show that authors vary significantly in how idiolectic their writing is, and that certain settings yield text that is more informative about authorship. The authors demonstrate that modeling multiple styles per author leads to significant performance improvements over traditional single-style approaches.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions

The paper "Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions" examines the difficulties of assessing text that is tailored to individual users’ styles. It critiques common metrics such as BLEU, embeddings, and LLM-as-judges, and introduces a style discrimination benchmark covering domain discrimination, authorship attribution, and LLM-generated personalized versus non-personalized discrimination across eight writing tasks. The study finds that ensembles of diverse evaluation metrics outperform single-evaluator approaches and offers guidance for reliable assessment of style-personalized generation.

By Anubhav Jangra, Bahareh Sarrafzadeh, Silviu Cucerzan, Adrian de Wynter, Sujay Kumar Jauhar
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 5

Author Representation Strategies for Zero-Shot Authorship Attribution: A Comparative Study of LLM-Based and Embedding-Based Approaches

The paper examines how different author representations affect zero‑shot authorship attribution (AA). It compares a label‑only prompting baseline with three strategies: representative writing samples, LLM‑generated descriptions, and style embeddings (LISA). The study finds that incorporating author‑specific representations improves performance, with a two‑stage LISA framework achieving the best results, while LLM‑generated descriptions offer a more compact but slightly less accurate alternative.

By Nudrat Habib, Tosin Adewumi, Sana Sabah Al-Azzawi, Marcus Liwicki, Elisa Barney
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Can Activation Steering Capture Multidimensional Authorship Style?

The paper investigates whether activation steering can capture the complex, multidimensional nature of authorship style. By using structured contrastive prompting along rhetorically motivated dimensions, the authors construct rich style representations directly in activation space, revealing a shared authorship backbone with aspect‑specific residuals. They propose Aspect‑Aware Activation Steering (A3S), a training‑free framework that merges per‑aspect contrastive directions, employs interference‑aware aggregation, and tunes steering strength per instance, achieving better authorship style transfer and outperforming a trained baseline on out‑of‑domain benchmarks.

By Hieu Tran, Calvin Bao, Marine Carpuat