arXiv:2610.08674v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Current large video-language models (LVLMs) still face challenges when dealing with long videos, mainly because frames are often processed independentl...
By Yuhao Qin, Junbo Wang, Yuke Li, Yining Zhu
arXiv:2607. 02963v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense video captioning aims to generate temporally grounded descriptions of video events, benefiting both event-level video understanding and generation.
By Wenzheng Zeng, Siyi Jiao, Chen Gao, Hwee Tou Ng, Mike Zheng Shou
arXiv:2608.28699v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Understanding long-form video remains a fundamental challenge for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Sparse frame sampling fails to capture fine...
By Dong-Hee Kim, Seonwoo Choi, Changbeen Kim, Jungmyung Wi, Juyeon Ko, Youngju Choi, Il Hyeon Mun, Hyunwoo J. Kim, Donghyun Kim
The paper introduces Seeing Before Synthesizing (SBS), a weakly-supervised dense video captioning framework that uses a vision‑language model to generate frame‑level narratives for gaps between events and detect transitions based on semantic changes. SBS refines temporal masks by aligning transition points with vision‑language cues, rather than relying on rigidly placed synthetic captions. Experiments on ActivityNet Captions and YouCook2 show that SBS achieves state‑of‑the‑art results in both captioning and localization tasks.
By Ye-Chan Kim, Seunghee Choi, SeungJu Cha, Si-Woo Kim, Hwiseon Kim, Hyungee Kim, Dong-Jin Kim
arXiv:2608.05592v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have made strong progress in video understanding, yet long videos remain difficult: the visual token budge...
By Ziling Huang, Shin'ichi Satoh
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved strong progress in video understanding, yet it remains challenging because the token limitation makes MLLMs difficult to capture temporally sparse evidence. Existing methods typically rely on uniform sampling, or frame selection, but these strategies usually optimize either broad temporal coverage or local relevance, making it difficult to preserve both global storyline context and fine-grained evidence.
Event-Causal RAG (EC‑RAG) is a lightweight retrieval‑augmented framework designed for reasoning over ultra‑long and streaming videos. It segments video streams into semantically complete events using a dual visual‑audio sentinel mechanism, representing each event as a State‑Event‑State (SES) structure that captures pre‑event, event, and post‑event states. During question answering, bidirectional graph retrieval accesses relevant predecessor and successor events from a dual vector‑graph memory, and answers are generated using both this structured memory and the corresponding video evidence. The authors also introduce ECV‑1H, an hour‑scale long‑video QA benchmark with over 150 hours of untrimmed video and 1,251 human‑annotated QA pairs, where EC‑RAG achieves significant accuracy gains across multiple video foundation models while maintaining efficient streaming memory usage on a single RTX 5090 GPU.
By Peizheng Yan, Yu Zhao, Liang Xie, Juntong Qi, Mingming Wang, Erwei Yin
arXiv:2606. 26994v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing referring video segmentation methods often treat a video as a single event consisting of multiple images, overlooking the fact that a video typically contains multiple distinct events.
By Jinyu Liu, Henghui Ding, Shuting He, Yu-Gang Jiang
arXiv:2610.26910v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-video understanding often requires answering many questions about a single video whose evidence is distributed across extended temporal contexts....
By Haonan Zhao, Jiaxuan Chen, Qingyang Liu, Shuochen Chang, Siyu Sun, Jiangtong Li, Li Niu
arXiv:2606. 06294v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Temporal Grounding (TG) aims to localize video segments corresponding to a textual query.
By Qi Xu, Yue Tan, Shihao Chen, Jiahao Meng, Anna Wang, Shunping Ji, Hao Fei, Jason Li
VidOmni-Bench is a new benchmark for fine‑grained video understanding that asks models to verify whether each event in dense video captions is supported by the video. It contains 500 videos covering five complexity types and durations from 4 seconds to 90 minutes, and uses human‑verified sentence‑level labels to create hard negatives. Experiments show that Video‑LLMs often hallucinate events, struggle to detect incorrect descriptions, and exhibit varying weaknesses depending on video complexity and duration.
By Changbeen Kim, Junwon Chang, Kipyo Kim, Risa Shinoda, Kuniaki Saito, Donghyun Kim
arXiv:2604.17422v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Long video understanding remains a formidable challenge for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) due to the prohibitive cost of processing dens...
By Shaoguang Wang, Weiyu Guo, Ziyang Chen, Xuming Hu, Hui Xiong