arXiv AI

More Choices, Fewer Decisions: Ordinal-Scale Bias in JEV-like Direct-Decision Models

arXiv AI
Jun 3

CoEval: Ranking Language Models for Custom Tasks Without Labeled Data or Trustworthy Benchmarks

arXiv:2606. 03650v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Choosing or ranking language models for a specific application is hardest when no task-specific labeled data exists, and standard public benchmarks cannot be trusted, their items having likely leaked into pretraining, so scores reflect memorization rather than fitness.

By Alexander Apartsin, Yehudit Aperstein
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Can We Trust LLM Judges: A Study of Capability-Dependent Biases and Multi-Judge Ensemble for Bias Calibration

The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) used as judges in absolute scoring tasks exhibit systematic biases that compromise reliability. It shows that a judge’s task accuracy strongly predicts both its judging accuracy and its directional bias, yet more capable examinee models consistently receive more lenient judgments. To mitigate these biases, the authors propose a calibrated weighted majority voting (WMV) ensemble that estimates judges’ error rates from inter-judge agreement patterns, achieving near-oracle performance without labeled data and improving both accuracy and fairness.

By Gemma Zhang, Prachi Badarayani, Asmi Kumar, Sadid Hasan, Sulaiman Vesal
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

JEV vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Places

The study investigates whether Jev, a typed classifier that outputs probabilities over allowed answers without generating text, can replace large language model (LLM) rubric judges. Across nine panels from seven benchmarks, Jev’s accuracy differed significantly from LLM judges in only 8 of 27 paired comparisons, performing best on binary criteria and worse only on graded ones, while most other comparisons were inconclusive. In terms of cost and speed, Jev was 29 to 325 times cheaper and 30 to 220 times faster than the flash‑tier LLM judges, and a cascade approach that defers uncertain Jev verdicts to an LLM yielded only modest gains. whyItMatters":"The findings suggest that a lightweight classifier like Jev can serve as an efficient first‑stage evaluator, potentially reducing the reliance on expensive and slow LLM judges in automated grading pipelines."

By Delip Rao, Chris Callison-Burch
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Baszta: Data-Centric Fine-Tuning of a Polish Multi-Label Safety Classifier

The paper presents Baszta, a Polish multi‑label content‑safety classifier trained by fine‑tuning the 124M‑parameter allegro/herbert‑base‑cased model on five categories (hate, vulgarity, sexual content, crime, self‑harm) using a Focal + R‑Drop objective. In out‑of‑distribution evaluation on the Gadzi Język benchmark, Baszta achieves a small but statistically significant improvement in micro‑F1 over the Bielik Guard system, though the macro‑F1 advantage disappears when both models are properly tuned. The study also explores calibration techniques, showing that per‑category temperature scaling can recover performance lost by Platt scaling or isotonic regression, and discusses the trade‑offs between robust calibration and adversarial recall.

By Adam G\'orski, Mateusz J\k{a}kalak, Rafa{\l} Jakubowski
arXiv AI
1d ago

On-Device Named-Entity Recognition: A Deployability Study of Accuracy, Cost, Reliability, and Confidence

The paper evaluates nine on‑device named‑entity recognition models ranging from classical taggers to large language models, measuring not only accuracy but also latency and output validity. Using a silver‑gold benchmark derived from an LLM judge panel and a human‑validated corpus, the study shows that encoder‑based models achieve comparable accuracy to a 4 B instruct LLM while being much smaller, faster, and producing no malformed output. Confidence calibration of GLiNER is analyzed, revealing over‑confidence but improved reliability after temperature scaling and thresholding.

By Vinay Kumar Chaganti