arXiv:2611.03179v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: People often attach instructions to their search queries, asking for pages written for beginners, documents in a certain language or official sources...
By S. M. Mahbub Uddin Ahmed, Abdullah Al Musaddiq
Glance is a retrieval‑augmented generation approach that eliminates the need for separate reranker models by adding a lightweight decision adapter and pointer head to a single 9B backbone. It scores candidate passages directly from a shared prefill, requiring only about 0.1 GiB of extra memory per decision skill. In fine‑tuning on MS MARCO, Glance outperforms the bge‑reranker‑v2‑m3 on SciFact and NFCorpus, and improves answer F1 on HotpotQA by 0.045, while scaling to 200 candidates it surpasses cross‑encoder reranking by 0.058 nDCG@10.
arXiv:2610.32318v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: System One models, or decision models, answer a question about an input with a calibrated probability instead of generated text. Within weeks of the fi...
By Michael Dinzinger, Kanishka Ghosh Dastidar, Michael Granitzer
DecisionRank introduces an on-policy distillation (OPD) method that trains decision models to replicate a generative LLM’s ranking knowledge by converting the student’s document scores into a ranked sequence and using a teacher to provide conditional feedback. The approach combines item‑space OPD with offline ranking supervision, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on retrieval benchmarks such as TREC DL, BEIR, and BRIGHT. Even with a 1.7B parameter model, DecisionRank outperforms its 27B generative teacher on TREC DL19–23, and at 8B it surpasses the generative listwise counterpart while running 24.5× faster on TREC DL and 16.7× faster on BRIGHT.
By Yanran Wu, Dian Yu, Chongyang Bai, Jieyi Zhang, Rui Liu, Tianyi Chen, Shike Mei, Hang Cui, Frank Shyu, Sandeep Pandey, Luke Simon, Chunwei Liu, Xi Liu
arXiv:2605. 04495v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies on evidence ranking to determine what information is exposed to the generator, yet existing retrieval and reranking methods primarily estimate query--document relevance.
By Zhipeng Song, Yizhi Zhou, Xiangyu Kong, Jiulong Jiao, Xuezhou Ye, Chunqi Gao, Xueqing Shi, Yu Wang, Yuhang Zhou, Heng Qi
The paper investigates whether System‑1‑style decision models can replace dedicated rerankers in retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) systems. After screening 21 open‑weight models on 11 benchmarks, the authors compare a promising decision model with a dedicated reranker on identical candidate lists. While limiting candidate text length improves reliability and makes some configurations competitive, a tuned reranker remains faster and uses less GPU memory, indicating that replacing a reranker requires balancing quality, latency, and memory.
By Qiaomu Li, Ying Xie