arXiv AI

Evaluating and Enhancing Negation Comprehension in Remote Sensing MLLMs

arXiv:2606. 20177v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in various Remote Sensing (RS) tasks.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

Benchmarking MLLMs via Cognitive Expected Scene Graph for Safety-Critical Visual Negation Understanding

The paper introduces a new benchmark for evaluating Multi‑Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on visual negation understanding, focusing on safety-critical scenarios. It defines the Scene Negation Understanding under Safety Cognition (SNUS) task and presents a high‑fidelity negative caption dataset that maps dense assertions of localized hazards. The authors also propose the Cognitive Expected Scene Graph (CESG) Score, a polarity‑aware, structure‑grounded metric that remains robust under semantic reversals, revealing that existing models and traditional metrics fail on this task.

By Zhiyun Jiang, Hanyong Wang, Binbin Liang, Yu Xie, Menglong Yang, Wei Li
arXiv AI
Sep 10

SAFIRE: Safety-Critical Benchmark for Fine-grained Fire and Smoke Understanding in Multimodal LLMs

SAFIRE is a large-scale benchmark for fire and smoke understanding in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), featuring 83,000 captioned images across 20 scenarios and 193,000 multiple-choice VQA questions derived from a 9.7K-image subset. The benchmark evaluates 10 dimensions of performance, from basic perception to higher-order reasoning, and employs a GPT‑5.4-assisted verification pipeline to ensure annotation quality. Experiments on ten open-source MLLMs (8B–38B) reveal an average accuracy of 61.9%, highlighting significant gaps in safety-critical reasoning, while fine-tuning vision encoders on just 7% of SAFIRE data boosts fire-scene classification accuracy from 20.1% to 64.5%. All resources are publicly available at https://risys-lab.github.io/SAFIRE/.

By Pengfei Li, Naufal Suryanto, Sicheng Zhang, Mohammad Alsharid, Muzammal Naseer
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 20

More with Less: a Large Scale Remote Sensing VLM with a Simple Recipe

arXiv:2607. 15942v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Remote sensing vision-language models are increasingly expected to support open-ended reasoning over Earth Observation data and a variety of tasks.

By Stefan Maria Ailuro (INSAIT, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"), Mario Markov (INSAIT, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"), Mohammad Mahdi (INSAIT, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"), Luc Van Gool (INSAIT, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"), Danda Pani Paudel (INSAIT, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski")
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 25

GeoNLI - A Natural Language Interpreter for Satellite Imagery

GeoNLI introduces a unified, modular pipeline that combines advanced SAM variants with multimodal large language models to perform satellite image captioning, visual question answering (VQA), and visual grounding. The EarthMind model achieves strong results on captioning and VQA, while multiple RemoteSAM-SAM and DiffuSAM pipelines are used for grounding, ultimately employing a majority‑voting ensemble across several models. The system reports 82% captioning accuracy, 83.32% VQA accuracy, and 64.94% grounding accuracy, demonstrating improved consistency over task‑specific approaches.

By Ashutosh Gandhe, Anupam Rawat, Geet Sethi, Kabir Nasiruddin, Madhav Kotecha, Panav Shah, Rakshit Sawarn, Soumitra Nayak
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

DisasterInsight is a building‑centric benchmark designed to evaluate vision‑language models (VLMs) for disaster response. Built on the xBD satellite dataset, it adds OpenStreetMap‑derived functional labels to 134,108 building instances and offers 15 task types, including instance assessment, scene counting, multi‑instance reasoning, and structured report generation. Experiments show that VLMs excel at visible damage detection but struggle with building function, multi‑instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting, and instruction tuning only partially mitigates these gaps.

By Sara Tehrani, Yonghao Xu, Leif Haglund, Amanda Berg, Gulnaz Zhambulova, Michael Felsberg
arXiv AI
Jun 6

DisasterBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for UAV-Based Disaster Response in Complex Environments

arXiv:2606. 06217v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a disaster unfolds, responders must answer not only what is happening, but also why it is happening, what will happen next, and what to do now, often from noisy low-altitude UAV views and under tight on-site compute constraints.

By Tan Zhang, Quanyou Li, Lu Zhang, Jun Liu, Xiaofeng Zhu, Ping Hu