The paper introduces a multi-objective reinforcement learning framework for planning AI data center build-outs, treating the long-term infrastructure decisions as a tiered Markov decision process. It proposes a preference-conditioned agent that can generate policies balancing cost, carbon, water, and reliability, and validates the approach on real site data across different commitment regimes. The study also presents a lightweight counterfactual rollout model to assess long-horizon dynamics and releases the associated environment, agents, and evaluation tools.
By Satyapragnya Kar, Rajarshi Das, PR Panigrahi
arXiv:2606. 17454v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agent performance is not just a modeling problem, it is fundamentally a systems problem.
By Gaurav Gupta, Vatshank Chaturvedi, Jun Huan, Anoop Deoras
arXiv:2607. 00871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving agents violate the assumption behind most learning-theoretic guarantees: the data, evaluator, components, and hypothesis space are produced by the policy being updated.
By Biswa Sengupta
arXiv:2610.15093v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: AI coding agents operate in iterative loops: they modify code, run tools, inspect the results, and decide what to do next. We call the design of this...
By Pramod Kumar, Raj Kumar Pandey
arXiv:2607. 10569v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern coding agents expose multiple tool surfaces -- IDE primitives, bash, and Model Context Protocol (MCP) code-execution -- and the field has shipped three contradictory claims about which one matters.
By Hong Yang, Qi Yu, Travis Desell
Agentic AI development today runs on token maxing: buying capability with tokens -- longer reasoning traces, more turns, wider tool payloads, bigger replayed contexts -- so tokens per task grow faster than task value. Falling per-token prices mask the pattern; total spend rises anyway.
arXiv:2607. 19338v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Coding agents increasingly operate in executable environments where a failed attempt produces actionable feedback rather than merely an incorrect answer.
By Qijia He, Jiayi Cheng, Chenqian Le, Rui Wang, Xunmei Liu, Yixian Chen, Jie Mei, Zhihao Wang, Xupeng Chen, Yuhuan Chen, Tao Wang
arXiv:2606. 31023v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hard-constrained sequential decision systems have no certified way to spend the test-time compute of modern AI: executing the multi-step drafts of a learned policy or a frozen LLM forfeits the feasibility guarantee a trusted solver provides, while invoking the solver at every step forfeits the speed the AI offers.
By Chenyu Zhou, Qiliang Jiang, Shuning Wu, Xu Zhou
arXiv:2607. 26313v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic systems act, so a defect in the evidence they retrieve becomes a wrong action with a currency cost.
By Gaston Besanson
arXiv:2607. 06906v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI development today runs on token maxing: buying capability with tokens -- longer reasoning traces, more turns, wider tool payloads, bigger replayed contexts -- so tokens per task grow faster than task value.
By Muayad Sayed Ali, Aliaksandra Novik, Anji Boddupally, Artem Yavorskyi, Chris Nickerson, Daniel Rica, Emily DuGranrut, Felix Leung, Garrett Prince, Grace Barnett, Heath Robinson, Hosain Al Ahmad, Jesse Resnick, Juan Carlos Farah, Jyothi Swaroop Meruga, Leonid Kuznetsov, Luke Gorham, Marie Schmoll, Michael Paciullo, Saumya Das, Sharath Sheripally, Tommy Griscom, Mykyta Osadchyi, Neha Mantri, Nick Westrum, Olivia Benowitz, Parikshith Kulkarni, Radik Chernyshov, Rakshith Vasudev, Rohith Nadimpally, Vikas Gangadevi, Waseem AlShikh
arXiv:2606. 00198v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While agents are increasingly spending more resources, today agent cost is mostly measured only after execution.
By Yuxiang Lin, Zihan Wang, Mengyang Liu, Yuxuan Shan, Longju Bai, Junyao Zhang, Xing Jin, Boshan Chen, Jinyan Su, Xingyao Wang, Jiaxin Pei, Manling Li
The paper proposes a token‑based method for including purchased AI inference in corporate Scope 3 greenhouse gas inventories, offering a structured four‑term factor that accounts for serving electricity, embodied hardware, data‑centre construction, and disclosed training runs. It provides an open dataset with cradle‑to‑gate boundaries, four tiers of activity data, and a rule to map model identifiers and regions to specific factors, revealing up to twelve‑fold variation between model classes and nine‑fold variation between regions. Example calculations show annual emissions of 8.5 kg CO₂e for a 200‑person firm and 2.1–8.3 t CO₂e for developers using mid‑class or frontier‑class models, respectively.
By Guillermo Llopis-Garcia (SOMA AI, Barcelona)