The paper investigates how truth representations in small language models are structured. Using a training‑free axis derived from the dominant singular vector of hidden‑state differences between true and false minimal pairs, the authors evaluate 14 models across six architectural families, including Mixture‑of‑Experts. The study examines whether a single direction captures truth, which components contribute, and how this applies to categories with computed truth values.
By Francesco Karim Vicidomini
arXiv:2609.24932v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Despite the success of neural models in natural language processing, their black-box nature limits interpretability and conceals the linguistic phenome...
By David Torres-Moreno, Jorge Hermosillo-Valadez, Asela Reig-Alamillo
Despite the success of neural models in natural language processing, their black-box nature limits interpretability and conceals the linguistic phenomena underlying their predictions. We present SLITE...
arXiv:2608.31084v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The Jacobian Lens (J-lens) is a recent tool for interpreting LLMs. It reads a hidden state as a ranked list of vocabulary tokens, leaving multi-token c...
By Xijie Gong, Tonghan Wang
The paper introduces a second-pass method for uncovering hidden relationships in knowledge graphs extracted from text, without altering the original facts. By chunking documents and embedding each chunk once, the approach uses top‑k nearest‑neighbor queries and Shepard inverse‑distance weighting to score candidate node pairs, avoiding threshold issues inherent in cosine scoring. The technique is order‑independent, scalable, and has been implemented across multiple graph databases, demonstrating high edge fidelity with lower‑dimensional embeddings and a 25× speedup in top‑k computation.
By Bilge Kaan Karamete, Hunter Casten
arXiv:2608.29034v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: A wide range of methods have been proposed for interpreting language models, delivering important insights into their inner workings. However, differ...
By Zhang Enyan, R. Thomas McCoy
arXiv:2606. 02385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have found success parsing neural representations into interpretable concepts, providing a basis for understanding and control.
By William Dorrell
arXiv:2607. 01762v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many representation learning problems involve directed relations, such as lexical entailment, sentence entailment, ontology hierarchy, and citation links.
By He Huang, Lu Shen, Yunfeng Huang, Li Qi
arXiv:2608. 05724v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse word embedding pipelines can avoid dense co-occurrence matrix materialization, dense factorization, and gradient training while still relying on sparse global corpus statistics.
By Sriram Loganathan, Gokul Anand, Aung Bo Bo, Yourui Shao, William B. Andreopoulos
Large language models (LLMs) are built from structured high-dimensional objects such as token representations, weights, adaptation updates, caches, and activations, whose multilinear structure is unde...
arXiv:2606. 31845v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A transformer's feed-forward (FFN) sublayer materializes the distinctions attention gathers, yet gives no account of what it computes.
By Mark Oskin
arXiv:2608. 04569v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hard prompt compression reduces long-context inference cost by independently scoring tokens, sentences, or chunks and retaining the highest-scoring units under a budget.
By Zhengpei Hu, Kai Li, Dapeng Fu, Xuechao Zou, Yuanhao Tang, Yue Li, Tengfei Cao, Jianqiang Huang