The Anatomy of a Truth Direction: Knowledge-Dependent Dimensionality, a Relational Law, and a Convergent Category Geometry in Small Language Models
arXiv:2607. 16741v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: B\"urger et al.
The paper investigates how truth representations in small language models are structured. Using a training‑free axis derived from the dominant singular vector of hidden‑state differences between true and false minimal pairs, the authors evaluate 14 models across six architectural families, including Mixture‑of‑Experts. The study examines whether a single direction captures truth, which components contribute, and how this applies to categories with computed truth values.
arXiv:2607. 16741v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: B\"urger et al.
arXiv:2601. 06599v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often encode whether a statement is true as a vector in their residual stream activations.
The paper investigates when compressed vector representations can provide exact linear or affine readouts for a finite lexicon’s truth conditions, establishing a necessary and sufficient row‑space condition. It shows that the augmented truth matrix’s rank determines the minimal dimension needed for exact linear (rank r) and affine (rank r − 1) readouts, and that exact readouts preserve Boolean connectives. Experiments on GloVe and word2vec embeddings reveal that while many predicates are linearly separable, none achieves exact affine recovery from pretrained embeddings, yet supervised transductive training can attain exact affine recovery at dimensions meeting the theoretical bound, preserving most of the original variance. "whyItMatters":"The results provide a precise mathematical criterion for when vector embeddings can faithfully encode logical truth conditions, informing both theoretical understanding and practical training of language models."
arXiv:2604.03754v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to encode truth of statements in their activation space along a linear truth direction. Previous...
The study investigates how large language models encode moral knowledge by training linear probes for each category of Moral Foundations Theory. It finds that the model’s representations for different moral foundations occupy distinct, largely independent dimensions yet share a common positive component, indicating an integrated but nuanced moral structure. This geometry is consistent across model architectures and scales, emerges early in pre‑training, and reflects corpus statistics rather than the individualizing/binding distinction of the theory.
arXiv:2608. 06417v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The proliferation of misinformation online has driven demand for scalable detection systems.
arXiv:2608. 02957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Steering vectors (SVs) are widely used to influence the expression of concepts (e.
arXiv:2607. 11945v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Capable language models hold what a character believes apart from what is true: told "Anna believes the cup is blue; in reality it is red," they answer blue about Anna and red about the world.
The paper investigates how large language models encode moral knowledge by training linear probes for each Moral Foundations Theory category and analyzing their geometric relationships. It finds that the model’s moral directions are largely independent yet share a common component, indicating integration rather than collapse into a single detector. This structure is consistent across architectures, emerges early in pre‑training, and reflects corpus statistics rather than the individualizing/binding distinction of Moral Foundations Theory.
arXiv:2606. 15821v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have produced many specialized multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) that share common foundational LLMs, forming distinct model lineages.
Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit sycophancy, where they agree with a user's statement even when incorrect. While sycophancy is often treated as a single defined behavior, it can manifest in substantially distinct ways and circumstances, raising the question of whether this multi-faceted nature is reflected in its internal mechanisms.
arXiv:2609.21509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When language models reason in chain-of-thought or exchange free-text intermediates, they serialize structured information into natural language. How m...