The paper argues that meaning identity—whether two sentences convey the same idea after wording changes—is not encoded in the geometry of independently produced sentence embeddings. Experiments on frozen off‑the‑shelf encoders and language models show that identity can only be reliably computed when both sentences are processed together in a single forward pass, yielding high accuracy (0.90–0.96) on PAWS‑X, whereas independent embeddings or simple fusion methods perform near chance. Even advanced bi‑encoder fine‑tuning improves performance on PAWS but fails to generalize to other similarity tasks, underscoring that identity is a cheap computed operator rather than a property of individual sentence vectors.
By Jiaqi Deng
arXiv:2608. 10251v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A transformer's answer lives on one axis: the direction its unembedding reads.
By Mark Oskin
arXiv:2609. 18145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Attention pays, at every layer and for every input, the cost of searching for whom to connect.
By Yoshiaki Takashita
arXiv:2609. 20278v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text, knowledge graphs, and hypergraphs all have elements that play distinct roles within relation instances, structure that is lost when data is flattened into token sequences.
By Mahesh Godavarti
arXiv:2609.01129v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We identify a recurrent algebraic regularity in Transformer attention: a sparse subset of effective OV operators $T=OV^\top$ nearly closes under compos...
By Jiming Feng, Junliang Li
The paper investigates how many transformer components influence a token prediction by measuring the absolute contribution of each unit and channel to the logit. It finds that thousands of components contribute to a single prediction, yet a small subset—often just dozens—carries the majority of the predictive mass. Across models ranging from 124 M to 7 B parameters, the proportion of the model involved in a prediction remains around one to three percent, independent of size, and the study demonstrates that specific components can be directly read and written to modify model behavior without additional training.
By Mark Oskin
arXiv:2601. 11618v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Geometric Attention (GA) specifies an attention layer by four independent inputs: a finite carrier (what indices are addressable), an evidence-kernel rule (how masked proto-scores and a link induce nonnegative weights), a probe family (which observables are treated as admissible), and an anchor/update rule (which representative kernel is selected and how it is applied).
By Luis Rosario Freytes
arXiv:2609.24635v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: When a language model reads an operation such as "Swap the contents of Box F and Box B", its forward pass writes keys and values for those tokens into...
By Lingfeng Wu, Behzad Shomali
arXiv:2605. 04893v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When a language model processes a hallucinated response, its attention routing tends to fail in one of two shapes: over-concentrating on a narrow set of positions, or spreading so diffusely that relevance is diluted, and the shape of the failure carries diagnostic signal.
By Dominik Dahlem, Diego Maniloff, Mac Misiura
arXiv:2608. 15022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models hold latent quantities in a form they can report on, and more of a quantity is present in that form when the task requires reusing it flexibly.
By Parsa Mazaheri
arXiv:2607. 04926v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How does the way information reaches a transformer -- as symbolic tokens, a clean per-factor "oracle" code, or an entangled perceptual vector -- shape whether it binds that information compositionally?
By Yoshiyuki Ootani
arXiv:2606. 02765v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model dimension ($d_{model}$) is a fundamental hyperparameter in transformer language models, yet its role in setting the geometric limits of feature representation remains under-explored.
By Alexander Guha