arXiv Machine Learning

Behavior Leverage Imbalance in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

arXiv:2607. 07050v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic language models must learn when to call tools, when to consume tool responses, and when to answer directly.

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

From Gradients to Capabilities: Understanding Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

The paper investigates how teacher signals influence parameter updates in Multi‑Teacher On‑Policy Distillation (MOPD) by analyzing Qwen3‑1.7B and SmolLM3‑3B. It shows that loss averaging, Adam’s first‑moment bias, BF16 rounding, and the choice of averaging rule all shape the gradients and ultimately affect task performance. The study quantifies these effects, revealing, for example, that token‑averaging favors longer responses and that BF16 rounding masks most weight changes.

By Siqi Zhu, Suozhi Huang, Kaixuan Zhang, Yuheng Yang, Zhanyang Jin, Yihang Sun, Jiaxuan You
arXiv AI
Jul 3

DemoPSD: Disagreement-Modulated Policy Self-Distillation

arXiv:2607. 02502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a practical method for training large language models (LLMs) to reason, where a single model acts as both the teacher and the student with different levels of information access.

By Yunhe Li, Hao Shi, Wenhao Liu, Mengzhe Ruan, Hanxu Hou, Zhongxiang Dai, Shuang Qiu, Linqi Song
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Trajectory-Refined Distillation

arXiv:2606. 08432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has become a central post-training tool for large language models (LLMs), providing dense per-token teacher supervision along the student's own rollouts.

By Li Jiang, Haoran Xu, Yichuan Ding, Amy Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 19

SOD: Step-wise On-policy Distillation for Small Language Model Agents

SOD: Step-wise On-policy Distillation for Small Language Model Agents proposes a new framework that adaptively reweights distillation strength at each reasoning step based on step-level divergence. This approach mitigates cascading errors in tool-integrated reasoning by attenuating misleading teacher signals in high-divergence regions while preserving dense guidance where student and teacher align. Experiments on math, science, and code benchmarks show up to 20.86% improvement over the second-best baseline, with a 0.6B student scoring 26.13% on AIME 2025.

By Qiyong Zhong, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Xin Lin, Jie Sun, Houcheng Jiang, Xiang Wang, Junfeng Fang