SPACE is a conformal wrapper that creates ellipsoidal joint prediction regions for multivariate time‑series forecasts by estimating time‑local covariance directly from the current forecast sample cloud. It calibrates the region’s radius using a dynamic backward window‑selection scheme, avoiding reliance on historical residuals. Experiments on diverse datasets show that SPACE improves joint and rolling coverage, achieving better coverage‑efficiency tradeoffs than existing wrappers.
By Baishi Li, Kelvin J. L. Koa, Ke-Wei Huang
The paper introduces SGA, a method for quantifying uncertainty in multi‑step forecasts from Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs). SGA models all possible forecast branches as a directed acyclic graph, using the graph’s complexity—derived from topology and TSFM stochasticity—to bound and measure uncertainty. Experiments on 11 TSFMs across 27 datasets show that SGA outperforms existing uncertainty‑quantification methods, offers broader sampling coverage, and reveals that larger TSFMs tend to produce lower uncertainty estimates.
By Xin-Yu Hu, Shuang Liang, Cheng Feng, Shao-Qun Zhang
arXiv:2607. 23165v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose ABF-T-GLCP, a model-agnostic framework for forecasting and uncertainty quantification in nonstationary multivariate time series.
By Ziling Ma, Junshu Jiang, \'Angel L\'opez-Oriona, Ying Sun, Hernando Ombao
arXiv:2607. 06690v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Finance, sensing, and demand streams violate the exchangeability that IID conformal prediction and the IID bootstrap assume, and existing libraries implement either a general resampling engine or conformal calibration without the other.
By Sankalp Gilda
Dynamic Regime-Aware Conformal Prediction (DRACP) is a new method that blends density‑ratio estimation, localized kernel weighting, and probabilistic regime‑aware weighting with a self‑tuning online significance controller to produce reliable prediction intervals under multiple distribution shifts. The authors prove finite‑sample validity with oracle weights, provide a coverage‑gap bound for estimated weights, and give deterministic or regret guarantees for the online controller. In experiments on 48 real forecasting series—including euro‑area inflation, US macroeconomic and energy indicators, and daily financial data—DRACP achieves the most reliable calibration, maintaining coverage close to the nominal 0.90 and never falling below 0.80, while other methods achieve narrower intervals but with higher under‑coverage.
whyItMatters":"DRACP offers a principled trade‑off between calibration and efficiency, ensuring that prediction intervals meet coverage standards even when economic data exhibit covariate shift, concept drift, and latent regimes."
By Bogdan Oancea
arXiv:2508. 13362v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) is well-suited for uncertainty quantification in time series forecasting due to its distribution-free coverage guarantees.
By Ruipu Li, Daniel Menacho, Alexander Rodr\'iguez
Conformal prediction (CP) provides distribution-free prediction intervals for fixed forecasters, but its standard calibration procedure is often inefficient for time series data, where forecast errors are temporally dependent and change across time and operating conditions. Recent time series CP methods improve local calibration using recent, weighted, or localized residuals.
arXiv:2608. 10553v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) provides distribution-free prediction intervals for fixed forecasters, but its standard calibration procedure is often inefficient for time series data, where forecast errors are temporally dependent and change across time and operating conditions.
By Sangjin Jin, Kangmin Kim, Junhyeong Lee, Yongjae Lee
arXiv:2606. 31600v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conformal prediction and its variants, including the split conformal prediction, provide a distribution-free framework for uncertainty quantification by constructing prediction intervals or sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees.
By Sayan Das, Bahram Yaghooti, Todd A. Kuffner, Soumendra N. Lahiri
arXiv:2606. 31915v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While conformal prediction provides a general framework for uncertainty quantification in predictive inference, its application is often limited by computational cost.
By Jiachen Cong, Jingbo Liu
arXiv:2606. 09473v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probabilistic forecasters are increasingly learned, yet the baselines they are compared against are often weak or omitted.
By Valery Manokhin
arXiv:2606. 27001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantifying the evolution of uncertainty is critical to both probabilistic forecasting and data assimilation in numerical weather prediction.
By Catherine George, Alireza Javanmardi, Tijana Janji\'c, Eyke H\"ullermeier