arXiv:2506.04920v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate formative feedback and instructional hints in English, making them inc...
By Junior Cedric Tonga, KV Aditya Srivatsa, Kaushal Kumar Maurya, Fajri Koto, Ekaterina Kochmar
arXiv:2608.22993v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Students increasingly use LLMs as tutors for coursework and problem solving. Little is known about the level of assistance LLMs provide when students u...
By Suhyeon Lee, Juneha Baek, Jaehyeong Park, Donghyuk Shin
arXiv:2605.14322v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Language agents are increasingly deployed in professional workflows, yet tutoring remains a high-stakes capability that existing evaluations only p...
By Zixin Chen, Peng Liu, Rui Sheng, Haobo Li, Jianhong Tu, Xiaodong Deng, Kashun Shum, Dayiheng Liu, Huamin Qu
RegulaTutor is a theory-informed framework for long‑term personalized tutoring that links a learner’s historical evidence to instructional support. Guided by self‑regulated learning research, it uses a cognitive, affective, metacognitive, and motivational (CAMM) framework to derive evidence‑supported learner interpretations and teaching policies that are updated as new observations arrive. The framework includes PairRoute, an offline refinement procedure that distinguishes harness, model, and mixed failures, proposes targeted harness revisions, and constructs stage‑level supervision for confirmed model failures, improving historical‑evidence accuracy, learner diagnosis, and teaching quality across evaluated model configurations.
By Yonggang Li, Boqian Han, Rui Sheng, Yushi Sun, Zixin Chen
arXiv:2608. 03952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to provide conversational practice for English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners.
By Dongjie Yang, Siyan Lin, Leixian Shen, Rui Sheng, Huamin Qu, Zixin Chen
arXiv:2607. 03303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) can provide personalized support in learning, several studies have raised concerns regarding their use in education.
By Jerome Brender, Laila El-Hamamsy, Kim Uittenhove, Aitor Perez, Patrick Jermann, Francesco Mondada, Engin Bumbacher
arXiv:2609.28470v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Artificial intelligence offers an unprecedented opportunity to augment human capabilities, yet progress at the frontier has focused primarily on advanc...
By Curtis Northcutt, Inaara Hasmani, Kevin Feng, Trevor Khangi, Andreas Plesner, Jonas Mueller
arXiv:2608. 07509v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are increasingly used for conversational tutoring, but effective tutoring requires more than correct answers.
By Fares Fawzi, Jiaxu Zhao, Tanya Nazaretsky, Tanja K\"aser
The paper introduces Universal Textual Teaching (UTT), a parameter‑update‑free framework that distills knowledge gaps between a Teacher and Student large language model into a reusable natural‑language artifact called a Primer. UTT identifies representative gap cases, then iteratively refines the Primer through a cycle of student attempts, prompter‑generated teaching instructions, teacher demonstrations, and synthesizer consolidation. Experiments on math (Omni‑MATH‑2) and code generation (KernelBench) show significant accuracy gains, outperforming prompt engineering and parameter‑based knowledge distillation, and the Primer generalizes across different Teacher‑Student pairs.
By Zhanyi Lu, Huan Wang
arXiv:2608. 05411v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as AI tutors, but a correct answer is not always a pedagogically appropriate one.
By Benjamin Barlog, Hudson Craig, Zedong Peng
arXiv:2608. 11259v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many AI tutors leverage large language models (LLMs) today.
By Tushar Udeshi, Anna Khazenzon, Kabir Khan, Nick Breen, RJ Corwin, Chris DiGiano, Kodi Weatherholtz, Marek Zaluski
PEARL is a framework that trains Socratic tutoring agents using pedagogically aligned reinforcement learning. It introduces a controllable student simulator to model diverse cognitive states, a reward model that jointly evaluates pedagogical quality and correctness, and a stable multi‑objective RL approach to balance competing tutoring goals. Experiments demonstrate that PEARL competes with both open‑source tutoring systems and leading proprietary LLMs.
By Qikai Chang, Zhenrong Zhang, Linbo Chen, Pengfei Hu, Jianshu Zhang, Youhui Guo, Jun Du