arXiv AI

RegulaTutor: A Theory-Informed Framework for Long-Term Personalized Learning

RegulaTutor is a theory-informed framework for long‑term personalized tutoring that links a learner’s historical evidence to instructional support. Guided by self‑regulated learning research, it uses a cognitive, affective, metacognitive, and motivational (CAMM) framework to derive evidence‑supported learner interpretations and teaching policies that are updated as new observations arrive. The framework includes PairRoute, an offline refinement procedure that distinguishes harness, model, and mixed failures, proposes targeted harness revisions, and constructs stage‑level supervision for confirmed model failures, improving historical‑evidence accuracy, learner diagnosis, and teaching quality across evaluated model configurations.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

CoLearn: An Agentic Tutor that Learns its Learner in a Human--AI Co-Learning Loop

CoLearn is an interactive, agentic tutoring system that learns about each learner through a persistent memory of mastery and misconceptions, updated with a Bayesian Knowledge Tracing model that uses a large language model as an observation function. It generates personalized questions targeting the learner’s weakest topics and recurring misconceptions, and provides a live evidence view for progress visualization and blind A/B comparison. In blind A/B tests, learners preferred questions conditioned on this memory 68‑69% of the time, and simulations show the agent’s belief converges toward the learner’s true mastery.

By Kailai He, Zhihao Wu, Linhai Zhang, Runcong Zhao, Yulan He, Jiazheng Li
arXiv AI
Sep 21

Self-Explanation Tutor for Active Study of CS1 Worked Examples

The paper presents ESSE, a self‑explanation tutor that uses a large language model to give immediate feedback on students’ line‑by‑line explanations of introductory programming worked examples. It evaluates the LLM’s judgments against a domain expert and a crowd of non‑experts, finding that the model is reliable enough to serve as the tutor’s assessment engine. In an introductory Java course, the tutor’s feedback encourages students to persist, improves the completeness and conceptual depth of their explanations, and shows evidence of learning.

By Arun-Balajiee Lekshmi-Narayanan, Mohammad Hassany, Kamil Akhuseyinoglu, Rully Hendrawan, Peter Brusilovsky
arXiv AI
6d ago

ReTeach: Building a Self-Teacher through Multi-Round Reflection and Retry

ReTeach is a reflective self‑distillation framework that builds a self‑teacher through multiple rounds of reflection and retry, relying only on self‑generated attempts and outcome‑level verification. Starting from an unsuccessful student rollout, the teacher alternates explicit reflection with new attempts until success or a retry limit is reached, without needing reference answers, external feedback, or cross‑example memory. The method uses outcome‑aware weighting to distinguish correct, reflection‑corrected, and unresolved examples, and on‑policy distillation aligns the student’s token‑level predictions with the teacher’s context‑conditioned distributions, achieving a 1.39‑point accuracy gain over GRPO across six reasoning benchmarks.

By Yafeng Tang, Hao Li, Hongsheng Yu, Qiang Fu
arXiv AI
Sep 25

A Risk-Adaptive and Evidence-Constrained Framework for Generative AI Feedback in Programming Education

The paper presents a risk‑adaptive, evidence‑constrained framework for providing feedback in introductory programming courses. Using data from 2,993 failed submissions by 215 students, the authors built models that predict persistent failure and generate four tailored feedback conditions for 136 cases. The framework employs calibrated risk to decide when to intervene, evidence gating to limit feedback content, and a progressive assistance strategy that moves from self‑checks to localized hints.

By Shihao Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 5

EduClaw-Bench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Pedagogical LLM Agents with Simulated Learners

arXiv:2608. 03206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) power educational applications from tutoring to essay scoring, but each is a point solution to a single task, and only recently have these point solutions been integrated into agents operating over a learning management system (LMS).

By Unggi Lee, Sookbun Lee, Yeil Jeong, Eunjoo Lee, Minchul Shin, Hoilym Kwon
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24

A Risk-Adaptive and Evidence-Constrained Framework for Generative AI Feedback in Programming Education

The paper presents a risk‑adaptive, evidence‑constrained framework that uses learning analytics to provide personalized feedback in introductory programming. By training models on 2,993 failed‑submission states from 215 students, the authors predict persistent failure and generate four tailored feedback conditions for 136 cases. A calibrated risk policy selects interventions for 17.8% of eligible states, capturing 25.2% of persistent failures, and the framework ensures that generated messages contain all required components after evidence gating.