arXiv:2606. 14965v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic instance-dependent label noise (IDN) benchmarks are widely used to evaluate noisy-label learning methods, yet existing approaches typically generate noise through imperfect annotators or classifier raters, leaving the source of ambiguity implicit.
By Shadman Islam, Agustinus Kristiadi, Mostafa Milani
arXiv:2608. 03432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Refurbishment-based noisy-label learning mixes an observed label with a model-derived pseudo target, typically using one sample-wise cleanliness score to control both branches.
By Wenxiao Fan, Kan Li
arXiv:2606. 11695v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-quality labeled data is essential for training reliable ML/DL models.
By Ha-Linh Nguyen, Hong-Anh Nguyen, Minh-Duc La, Phong Lam, Thu-Trang Nguyen, Son Nguyen, Hieu Dinh Vo
arXiv:2608. 04147v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Label noise is common in medical imaging datasets due to factors such as inter-rater variability, annotation errors, and ambiguous cases.
By Abhishek Moturu, Babak Taati, Anna Goldenberg
arXiv:2608. 03511v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Active learning (AL) promises to reduce the cost of medical imaging projects by lowering the number of clinical labels required.
By Julia Machnio, Mads Nielsen, Mostafa Mehdipour Ghazi
arXiv:2606. 07128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Raw numerical datasets remain less systematically examined in integrity screening than images, plagiarism, or summary-statistic inconsistencies.
By Zhuphua Cao
arXiv:2606. 11699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of machine learning and deep learning models largely depends on the quality of the training data.
By Ha-Linh Nguyen, Hong-Anh Nguyen, Minh-Duc La, Thu-Trang Nguyen, Son Nguyen, Hieu Dinh Vo
arXiv:2608. 06511v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adaptive data-cleaning methods replace manual filtering thresholds with data-driven partitions.
By Wei-Hsiang Chen, Pin-Hsuan Yu, Chen-Hsuan Fang, Jung-Hua Wang
arXiv:2607. 15455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers increasingly use automated classifiers to label unstructured data for statistical analysis.
By Robert Chew, Matthew R. Williams
arXiv:2608. 14768v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Skin lesion classifiers can be confidently wrong on the cases that matter most, so knowing when a prediction should not be trusted is clinically as useful as the prediction.
By Leon Koole, Jiapan Guo, Matias Valdenegro-Toro
arXiv:2608. 17775v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Anomaly detectors are hardest to deploy exactly where training data is scarcest: a newly commissioned production line has a handful of verified "golden" samples and no machine-learning engineer on the factory floor.
By Ayusha Abbas, Saram Abbas, Kabita Adhikari
arXiv:2601. 11670v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pseudo-label selection in semi-supervised learning is commonly driven by maximum-confidence thresholds, yet confidence alone can be unreliable under model overconfidence and class imbalance.
By Jinshi Liu, Lei He, Pan Liu