arXiv:2606. 14965v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic instance-dependent label noise (IDN) benchmarks are widely used to evaluate noisy-label learning methods, yet existing approaches typically generate noise through imperfect annotators or classifier raters, leaving the source of ambiguity implicit.
arXiv:2606. 11699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of machine learning and deep learning models largely depends on the quality of the training data.
arXiv:2608. 03432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Refurbishment-based noisy-label learning mixes an observed label with a model-derived pseudo target, typically using one sample-wise cleanliness score to control both branches.
arXiv:2606. 11695v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-quality labeled data is essential for training reliable ML/DL models.
arXiv:2510.16211v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Label noise is a common problem in real-world datasets, affecting both model training and validation. Clean data are essential for achieving strong...
arXiv:2601. 17469v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown remarkable capabilities in learning from graph-structured data with various applications such as social analysis and bioinformatics.
arXiv:2610.01028v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models often suffer performance degradation under subpopulation shift, particularly when spurious correlations cause models to rely...
The paper compares five machine unlearning (MU) methods—NegGrad, Fine‑Tuning (FT), Random Labeling (RL), SalUn, and MUNBa—on noisy‑label correction across CIFAR‑10, CIFAR‑100, and Food‑101N. Results show that the best MU strategy depends on the noise type: FT works well for most closed‑set noise, RL and SalUn are robust and nearly match retraining accuracy under instance‑dependent noise, while MUNBa excels only under extreme symmetric noise. In open‑set noise, retraining on the cleaned data actually hurts performance, indicating that approximating retraining is not suitable in that regime, yet all MU methods still achieve near‑retraining accuracy on Food‑101N with much lower runtime.
arXiv:2606. 07086v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel in computer vision tasks given large annotated datasets.
arXiv:2511. 14117v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Supervised classifiers output a distribution over classes but are typically trained against a single label obtained by collapsing multiple annotators into a majority vote.
arXiv:2605. 02122v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Human evaluation remains the primary standard for assessing modern AI systems, yet annotator disagreement, bias, and variability make system rankings fragile under standard majority vote aggregation.
arXiv:2512.12870v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Active Learning (AL) is commonly used in applications where labeling data is expensive or time-consuming. In practice, however, labels are of...
arXiv:2606. 11616v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-quality training data is essential for the success of machine learning models.