arXiv:2608. 19376v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Split-conformal prediction provides marginal coverage under exchangeability and is increasingly used as an abstention layer for zero-shot vision-language models (VLMs).
By Jai Kumar Sharma, Amartya Dutta
arXiv:2606. 28598v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prediction sets should have high coverage to be useful, but some coverage notions are more practically relevant than others.
By Aabesh Bhattacharyya, Tiffany Ding, Rina Foygel Barber
Split-conformal prediction provides marginal coverage under exchangeability and is increasingly used as an abstention layer for zero-shot vision-language models (VLMs). We audit this practice under de...
The paper introduces a new active learning signal for object detection that relies on a supervised contrastive term added to the training objective. This term shapes an embedding space where distance reflects class membership, allowing an unlabeled detection to be scored by its distance from the predicted category’s region weighted by confidence—all from a single forward pass of one network. Experiments on PASCAL VOC and MS‑COCO show that this criterion outperforms the standard posterior and remains competitive with ensemble‑based methods while incurring only a modest 8.3% increase in parameters.
By Licheng Zhang, Zheng Gong
The paper introduces a label‑free method called AURCC for selecting the best foundational model for medical image classification when the target domain lacks labels. AURCC uses a pseudo‑label discrepancy computed by the SUDO framework to score models without fine‑tuning. Experiments on chest X‑ray data across three inter‑hospital shifts show that AURCC closely matches the true model ranking, outperforming simple source‑accuracy baselines especially when source data are limited.
By Juan I\~naki Larrea, Lucas Mansilla, Enzo Ferrante
arXiv:2608.30699v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Long-tailed distributions are prevalent in real-world semi-supervised learning (SSL), where pseudo-labels tend to favor majority classes, leading to...
By Yue Cheng, Jiajun Zhang, Xiaohui Gao, Weiwei Xing, Zhanxing Zhu
arXiv:2307.12226v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Machine learning models -- including prominent zero-shot models -- are often trained on datasets whose labels are only a small proportion of...
By Nicholas Roberts, Xintong Li, Dyah Adila, Sonia Cromp, Tzu-Heng Huang, Jitian Zhao, Frederic Sala
arXiv:2405. 07780v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper explores test-agnostic long-tail recognition, a challenging long-tail task where the test label distributions are unknown and arbitrarily imbalanced.
By Zhiyong Yang, Qianqian Xu, Sicong Li, Zitai Wang, Xiaochun Cao, Qingming Huang
arXiv:2604. 21395v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Ordinary supervised training minimises the task loss and then stops.
By Vishal Rajput
The paper introduces soft‑label‑based estimators for the Bayes‑optimal balanced error rate (BER) and area under the ROC curve (AUC), extending from a clean setting with known class priors to a realistic scenario with unknown priors and corrupted soft labels. It also adapts the FeeBee evaluation framework to assess these estimators without needing the true optimum, providing practical evaluation scores for any estimator of optimal BER or AUC. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets confirm the effectiveness of both the estimators and the evaluation method.
By Ryota Ushio, Takashi Ishida, Masashi Sugiyama
The paper investigates how to choose the best quantized model from a family of compressed versions when target labels are scarce or unavailable. It finds that a simple rule based on minimum teacher distortion consistently selects the same eight‑bit, per‑channel, unclipped configuration, though this does not minimize empirical target cross‑entropy. The study also shows that confidence‑based estimators perform poorly in overconfident regimes, while output‑distribution estimators can outperform the teacher in some architectures, and that combining distortion with a supervised term can improve selection. Across 134 candidate families, teacher‑anchored selection reduces mean regret with very few labels, though the benefit diminishes after about 25 labels.
By Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez, Muhammad Shahzad, Xia Hong
arXiv:2410.18321v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Confidence calibration matters wherever a classifier's probabilities, not just its labels, are consumed downstream. We study Focal Calibration Loss...
By Wenhao Liang, Liangwei Zheng, Wei Zhang, Weitong Chen