Evaluating RL Explainability Methods by How Much They Help Fix Bugs in Agents
arXiv:2608. 17524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This preliminary paper outlines a planned evaluation benchmark for Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) methods.
arXiv:2607. 24577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains such as robotics, autonomous driving, and drone control, where unexpected behaviors may lead to severe real-world consequences.
arXiv:2608. 17524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This preliminary paper outlines a planned evaluation benchmark for Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) methods.
arXiv:2608. 17393v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning for coding agents increasingly relies on long-running agent harnesses to manage tool integration, repository contexts, and execution feedback.
arXiv:2607. 01793v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly perform autonomous actions through external tools, leading to complex and evolving safety risks.
arXiv:2608. 16349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents may assist flight crews with complex decisions and task execution, but existing aviation evaluations centered on static knowledge do not support systematic testing of procedural execution and safety compliance in interactive environments.
arXiv:2607. 07029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) policies can be unsafe and vulnerable to attacks.
arXiv:2608. 04317v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous cyber defense systems based on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) have attracted significant research attention, yet remain evaluated almost exclusively against static, heuristic red agents, leaving their robustness against adaptive threats critically understudied.
arXiv:2604. 02478v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep learning models excel at detecting anomaly patterns in normal data.
arXiv:2606. 01066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) replaces human preference labels with executable reward functions such as math answer checkers, JSON tool-call validators, and code unit-test harnesses.
Autonomous cyber defense systems based on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) have attracted significant research attention, yet remain evaluated almost exclusively against static, heuristic red agents, leaving their robustness against adaptive threats critically understudied. Meanwhile, recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have improved LLM reasoning, but their integration into cybersecurity remains elusive due to the absence of suitable benchmark environments and interaction datasets.
arXiv:2607. 26656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world vulnerabilities often span multiple functions, yet most learning-based detectors classify each function in isolation: on a sample of real CVEs, we find that 71.
arXiv:2606. 28403v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vulnerability detection in C/C++ software remains a major security challenge due to code complexity, manual memory management, and the limitations of traditional static analysis.
arXiv:2606. 22678v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agentic coding harnesses - such as Agent-Skills, Superpowers, and Agent-Rigor - are increasingly deployed to augment underlying LLMs for real-world software engineering tasks.