Universal approximation in reservoir computing is typically associated with a class of reservoirs. We show that universality can be associated with a single reservoir, considering a minimal setup of a single atom in front of a mirror.
arXiv:2607. 18552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses the dynamics of a fixed or weakly tuned quantum system to transform temporal and sequential inputs into measured features, while training is typically confined to a classical readout.
By Shehbaz Tariq, Muhammad Talha, Arshid Ali, Muhammad Diyan, Symeon Chatzinotas
arXiv:2605. 12713v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In the field of quantum reservoir computing (QRC), many different computational models and architectures have been proposed.
By Erik L. Connerty, Ethan N. Evans
arXiv:2501. 08640v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a way to bound the generalisation errors of several classes of quantum reservoirs using the Rademacher complexity.
By Naomi Mona Chmielewski (L2S), Nina Amini (L2S, CNRS), Joseph Mikael
The paper investigates quantum reservoir computing using highly scrambling quantum systems modeled by high‑order unitary designs. It shows that in noiseless settings, measurement readouts become exponentially concentrated as the reservoir size grows, but this concentration does not worsen with repeated iterations, while memory of early inputs decays exponentially with both reservoir size and iterations. In noisy environments, memory also decays exponentially over time for local noisy channels, and the study introduces new proof techniques for bounding concentration in temporal quantum models. Numerical results indicate that even physical reservoirs, such as an Ising model in a quantum‑chaotic phase, can exhibit exponential concentration, whereas reservoirs in a many‑body localized phase or at the edge of chaos do not.
By Weijie Xiong, Zo\"e Holmes, Armando Angrisani, Yudai Suzuki, Thiparat Chotibut, Supanut Thanasilp
arXiv:2609.36901v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Modeling the response of driven many-body quantum systems from input--output data is difficult: the dynamics are nonlinear, history dependent, and ex...
By Abhijit Sen, Bikram Keshari Parida, Shital Chauhan, Mahima Arya, Denys I. Bondar
arXiv:2607. 09905v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Can a small quantum computer forecast a changing signal better than an ordinary classical method?
By Tushar Pandey
The paper introduces task‑resolved Fisher spectroscopy for quantum reservoir computing, defining orthonormal score coordinates from prediction targets that reweight labeled histories to produce an affine family of reservoir states and measurement outcomes. It establishes a Fisher‑information hierarchy linking state quantum Fisher information, measurement record Fisher information, and moment matrices up to many‑body order, providing a quadratic form that equals the stationary capacity of the optimal linear readout. The method requires only stationary labeled records and measured outcomes, enabling predictions of held‑out capacities, necessary feature order, and measurement‑budget dependence, and demonstrates how optimizing local measurement axes can recover hidden task information in a five‑spin open reservoir.
By Yang Peng
arXiv:2504. 05336v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it.
By Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo
arXiv:2607. 19506v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses fixed quantum dynamics as a high-dimensional temporal feature map and trains only a lightweight classical readout.
By Krishna Bhatia, Gautami Sanjay Naik
arXiv:2608. 01194v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence has been transformed by deep neural networks, yet the search for new learning architectures continues.
By L\'eo Monbroussou, Maniraman Periyasamy, Viacheslav Kuzmin, Pavel Sekatski, Viktoria Patapovich, Asel Sagingalieva, Alexey Melnikov
arXiv:2607. 00365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum information (QI) are rapidly co-evolving.
By Min Chen, Yu Gan, Xin Jin, Yuqing Li, Junqi Wang, Zeguan Wu, Yunfei Wang, Bingzhi Zhang, Priyam Srivastava, Tianlong Chen, Ankit Kulshrestha, Yuan Liu, Juan Jos\'e Mendoza-Arenas, Kaushik P. Seshadreesan, Sarvagya Upadhyay, Xueyue Zhang, Quntao Zhuang, Junyu Liu