arXiv:2607. 09905v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Can a small quantum computer forecast a changing signal better than an ordinary classical method?
arXiv:2607. 07978v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reservoir computing uses a fixed quantum circuit as a feature generator and trains only a simple linear readout on top of it.
Quantum reservoir computing uses a fixed quantum circuit as a feature generator and trains only a simple linear readout on top of it. This makes it cheap to train and free of the optimisation problems that affect many quantum machine-learning models.
arXiv:2607. 18552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses the dynamics of a fixed or weakly tuned quantum system to transform temporal and sequential inputs into measured features, while training is typically confined to a classical readout.
arXiv:2607. 19506v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses fixed quantum dynamics as a high-dimensional temporal feature map and trains only a lightweight classical readout.
arXiv:2504. 05336v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it.
arXiv:2607. 24065v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this study, we developed and evaluated four conditional energy-based forecasting architectures: a classical Gaussian-Bernoulli CRBM, a hybrid quantum-classical QCRBM, a full-register QQRBM, and a lag-feature QFeatureQRBM with complete derivations of their conditional distributions, Contrastive-Divergence gradients, and hybrid training, bridging the energy-based formulation and the implementation-level quantum computation.
arXiv:2608. 19497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We characterize the learning dynamics of a compact hybrid quantum forecasting model through comparison with a structurally aligned classical baseline.
arXiv:2607. 01197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum computing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm for machine learning (ML), with the potential to offer computational advantages over classical approaches.
Circuit cutting lets a large quantum neural network (QNN) run as independent subcircuits on small devices, but rebuilding its outputs by reconstruction carries a classical sampling overhead exponential in the number of cuts - the dominant runtime cost in prior work. We ask whether, for machine-learning tasks, this step is necessary, and replace it with late fusion: each subcircuit is trained and measured independently, and a small classical head combines their outputs - a linear-cost, decision-level combination borrowed from multimodal learning.
arXiv:2608. 05595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Circuit cutting lets a large quantum neural network (QNN) run as independent subcircuits on small devices, but rebuilding its outputs by reconstruction carries a classical sampling overhead exponential in the number of cuts - the dominant runtime cost in prior work.
arXiv:2604.07639v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Broadly applicable quantum advantage, particularly in classical data processing and machine learning, has been a fundamental open problem. In...
arXiv:2510.25183v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Energy-efficient AI should be evaluated across the full application pipeline, not only by lowest error or shortest training time. We study th...