arXiv Machine Learning

ARMD-Predict: multi-site machine learning to predict antibiotic resistance before culture results

ARMD‑Predict is a multi‑site machine‑learning system trained on 7.5 million culture‑antibiotic records from four academic medical centers to forecast antibiotic resistance before culture results are available. It offers two tiers of models: one set predicts susceptibility to individual antibiotics, while a hierarchical set first identifies the infecting organism and then its resistance profile. In internal testing, the models achieved median AUROCs of 0.77 for inpatient urine and 0.70 for inpatient blood cultures, and could flag a substantial proportion of ceftriaxone‑susceptible and resistant cases for narrower or broader therapy, respectively.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Machine Learning for Pre-Culture ESBL Risk Stratification to Guide Empiric Antibiotic Selection: A 12-Hospital Study of Enterobacteriaceae Cultures

The study presents a cost‑sensitive XGBoost model that predicts ESBL‑producing Enterobacteriaceae at the time of culture ordering using 45 pre‑culture EHR features from 132,955 cultures across 12 hospitals. At 90% sensitivity the model achieves a 95.8% negative predictive value, potentially allowing carbapenem‑sparing therapy in non‑ICU settings while avoiding unnecessary broad‑spectrum treatment for 307 out of every 1,000 cultures, at the expense of 14 missed ESBL cases per 1,000. SHAP analysis highlights prior ESBL colonization as the strongest predictor, with minimal performance loss when socioeconomic deprivation features are omitted, supporting equitable bedside deployment.

By Aravind V. Kuruvikkattil, Lalitha Pranathi Pulavarthy, Rashmita Kudamala, Saptarshi Purkayastha
arXiv Machine Learning
23h ago

Machine Learning for Live-Birth Prediction After IVF/ICSI From Structured Clinical Data: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Appraisal

This systematic review and meta‑analysis examined 48 machine‑learning studies that predict live‑birth outcomes after IVF/ICSI using routine clinical data. The pooled discrimination of internally validated models was an AUC of 0.814, while externally validated models had an AUC of 0.756, with no significant difference between them. Most studies (47/48) were at high or unclear risk of bias, only four assessed calibration, and none demonstrated clinical impact, leading to a low‑to‑very‑low certainty of evidence.

By Abdul Raheem Shahzad, Muhammad Zaheer Khan, Umar Ajaib, Asad Ur Rehman, Juan Deng, Ming Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 11

FoMoH: A clinically meaningful foundation model evaluation for structured electronic health records

arXiv:2505. 16941v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) promise to address core limitations of traditional supervised machine learning: (i) reliance on large amounts of labeled data, (ii) task specificity, and (iii) poor transportability.

By Vincent Jeanselme, Zilin Jing, Aparajita Kashyap, Chao Pang, Florent Pollet, Young Sang Choi, Xinzhuo Jiang, Yuta Kobayashi, Yanwei Li, Sara Matijevic, Karthik Natarajan, Shalmali Joshi
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

Development and Validation of a Dynamic Kidney Failure Prediction Model based on Deep Learning: A Real-World Study with External Validation

arXiv:2501. 16388v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a progressive disease with high morbidity and mortality, has become a significant global public health problem.

By Jingying Ma, Jinwei Wang, Lanlan Lu, Zhiqin Jiang, Mengling Feng, Feifei Zhang, Peng Shen, Yexiang Sun, Shenda Hong, Luxia Zhang