arXiv AI By Xiaohua Douglas Zhang

Hit Selection Using SSMD-Based Machine Learning Performance Metrics in High-Throughput Screening Assays

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 07609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-throughput screening (HTS) assays are central to early-stage drug discovery but are often limited by extreme data sparsity, as primary screens typically use only a single replicate per test substance.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Predicting Quantifiability from Primary Screens to Prioritize Dose-Response Profiling

The paper introduces a framework to predict whether a compound’s potency can be quantified in dose‑response profiling, treating quantifiability as a separate triage goal from biological activity. It shows that features from low‑cost primary screens, rather than molecular structure, strongly predict quantifiability, and that this prediction holds across new chemical scaffolds and assay families. The authors argue that incorporating quantifiability predictions can better allocate expensive dose‑response resources.

By Sean Lim
arXiv AI
Sep 25

TopU-LBVS: A Realistic Multi Target Benchmark for Ligand Based Virtual Screening

TopU-LBVS is a new multi‑target benchmark for ligand‑based virtual screening that addresses shortcomings of existing datasets by using hard‑negative decoys and a fixed 1:40 active‑to‑decoy ratio. It covers 93 protein targets across seven classes, provides three evaluation protocols (full, low‑data, and mini), and includes curated ChEMBL‑35 bioactivity data with property‑matched, structurally similar decoys. The benchmark demonstrates that performance drops sharply when moving from random‑decoy to hard‑negative evaluation, and it releases data, splits, code, and baseline implementations for reproducible comparison.

By Surbhi Kumar, Yuhe Zhou, Varun Shiralkar, Niu Huang, Baris Coskunuzer
arXiv AI
Sep 10

The Accuracy Paradox: Empirical Diagnostic of Default Decision Thresholds in Multi-Label Enzyme Commission Prediction [With Code]

The study evaluates the use of default decision thresholds (t=0.50) in multi‑label enzyme commission (EC) number prediction across 14,096 compounds and six EC classes. It finds a high mean accuracy of 77.16% but low macro F1 (0.3976) and macro recall (0.3872), indicating severe class‑imbalance issues: majority classes are over‑predicted while minority classes, especially EC6, have zero recall despite reasonable ROC‑AUC. The authors recommend target‑specific threshold tuning and conformal calibration as post‑processing safeguards to expose and correct these hidden errors.

By Bilal Ahmad, Rajed Mehmood
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24

TopU-LBVS: A Realistic Multi Target Benchmark for Ligand Based Virtual Screening

TopU-LBVS is a new multi‑target benchmark for ligand‑based virtual screening that addresses shortcomings of previous datasets by using hard‑negative decoys and a fixed 1:40 active‑to‑decoy ratio. It covers 93 protein targets across seven classes, provides three evaluation protocols (full, low‑data, and mini), and includes curated ChEMBL‑35 bioactivity data with property‑matched, structurally similar decoys to reduce shortcut learning. The benchmark comes with released data, fixed splits, evaluation code, and baseline implementations for reproducible comparison of LBVS and molecular representation methods.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Do Larger Models Really Win in Drug Discovery? A Benchmark Assessment of Model Scaling in AI-Driven Molecular Property and Activity Prediction

arXiv:2604. 26498v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The rapid growth of molecular foundation models and large language models (LLMs) has encouraged a scale centred view of AI in drug discovery, in which larger pretrained models are expected to supersede compact cheminformatics models.

By Jinjiang Guo, Sheng Ding