arXiv Machine Learning

Nonsmooth Optimization via Orthogonalized Momentum

arXiv AI
Oct 5

Training-Loss Guarantees for Muon with Finite-Step Newton--Schulz Orthogonalization

arXiv:2610. 03306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing convergence analyses of Muon either assume exact orthogonalization or analyze classical Newton--Schulz polynomials, and guarantee only stationarity, so it is unresolved what Muon's five tuned Newton--Schulz steps preserve and whether that suffices to reach a prescribed neural-network training loss.

By Amartya Roy, Souvik Chakraborty
arXiv Statistics ML
Oct 28

Phases of Muon: When Muon Eclipses SignSGD

The paper analyzes the stochastic optimizer Muon, which orthogonalizes an exponential moving average of minibatch gradients, and compares its behavior to the baseline SignSGD on a high‑dimensional matrix‑valued least squares problem. It derives deterministic dynamics showing Muon’s sensitivity to an effective batch size and its failure to resolve small eigenmodes when whitening is exact and the effective batch is small, while Momentum and finite Newton–Shulz iterations can mitigate this. The study presents a phase diagram in terms of data and target exponents, indicating when Muon or SignSGD is preferable based on covariance spectrum steepness and target loss scaling.

By Elliot Paquette, Noah Marshall, Lucas Benigni, Guangyuan Wang, Atish Agarwala, Courtney Paquette
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Muon with Finite Newton-Schulz: The Smoothing Benefit in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization

The paper introduces Muon, an optimizer that uses a finite number of Newton‑Schulz iterations to approximate the polar factor for matrix‑valued parameters in large language model pretraining. It demonstrates that this finite iteration smooths the discontinuous polar map into a Lipschitz function of singular values, enabling a conversion from online learning regret to a stationarity guarantee in nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. The authors prove that a logarithmic depth in Newton‑Schulz suffices for convergence to stationary points, matching best‑known sample complexity bounds and extending the result to other spectral maps with similar smoothing properties.

By Mingyi Li, Taira Tsuchiya
arXiv AI
Aug 25

A Physical Response-and-Memory Model for Muon Optimization

The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.

By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Low-rank Orthogonalization for Large-scale Matrix Optimization with Applications to Foundation Model Training

The paper introduces low‑rank orthogonalization, a technique that exploits the low‑rank nature of gradients in neural network training to perform matrix orthogonalization more efficiently. Building on this, the authors present low‑rank matrix‑signed gradient descent (MSGD) and a low‑rank variant of the Muon optimizer, showing through experiments that low‑rank Muon matches or surpasses vanilla Muon on GPT‑2 and LLaMA pretraining, especially for larger models. Theoretical analysis provides iteration‑complexity bounds for both low‑rank MSGD and low‑rank Muon under heavy‑tailed noise.

By Chuan He, Zhanwang Deng, Zhaosong Lu