arXiv:2606. 08783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Orthogonalized momentum updates, as used in Muon-style optimizers, have recently shown strong empirical stability in large-scale deep learning.
By Ganzhao Yuan
arXiv:2610.19844v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Memory-efficient subspace optimization has emerged as a practical approach to reducing the memory cost of LLM training while preserving optimization pe...
By Sifan Yang, Hongyi Tao, Dingzhi Yu, Haomin Bai, Wei Jiang, Silin Gao, Pi Bu, Lijun Zhang
arXiv:2610.20112v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Prior work on implicit bias shows that gradient descent selects the Frobenius max-margin direction on linearly separable problems, whereas Fan et al. (...
By Yongtao Wu, Mahdi Mansouri, Zhenyu Zhu
arXiv:2610. 03306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing convergence analyses of Muon either assume exact orthogonalization or analyze classical Newton--Schulz polynomials, and guarantee only stationarity, so it is unresolved what Muon's five tuned Newton--Schulz steps preserve and whether that suffices to reach a prescribed neural-network training loss.
By Amartya Roy, Souvik Chakraborty
The paper analyzes the stochastic optimizer Muon, which orthogonalizes an exponential moving average of minibatch gradients, and compares its behavior to the baseline SignSGD on a high‑dimensional matrix‑valued least squares problem. It derives deterministic dynamics showing Muon’s sensitivity to an effective batch size and its failure to resolve small eigenmodes when whitening is exact and the effective batch is small, while Momentum and finite Newton–Shulz iterations can mitigate this. The study presents a phase diagram in terms of data and target exponents, indicating when Muon or SignSGD is preferable based on covariance spectrum steepness and target loss scaling.
By Elliot Paquette, Noah Marshall, Lucas Benigni, Guangyuan Wang, Atish Agarwala, Courtney Paquette
arXiv:2609.39595v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Practical Muon maintains momentum and performs a small, fixed number of Newton--Schulz iterations separately for each parameter matrix, often with a Ne...
By Hanyng Peng, Hui Wang, Yue Yu
The paper introduces Muon, an optimizer that uses a finite number of Newton‑Schulz iterations to approximate the polar factor for matrix‑valued parameters in large language model pretraining. It demonstrates that this finite iteration smooths the discontinuous polar map into a Lipschitz function of singular values, enabling a conversion from online learning regret to a stationarity guarantee in nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. The authors prove that a logarithmic depth in Newton‑Schulz suffices for convergence to stationary points, matching best‑known sample complexity bounds and extending the result to other spectral maps with similar smoothing properties.
By Mingyi Li, Taira Tsuchiya
arXiv:2608. 04607v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods are the standard instruments for the training of deep neural networks (DNNs).
By Thang Do, Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen
The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.
By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
The paper introduces low‑rank orthogonalization, a technique that exploits the low‑rank nature of gradients in neural network training to perform matrix orthogonalization more efficiently. Building on this, the authors present low‑rank matrix‑signed gradient descent (MSGD) and a low‑rank variant of the Muon optimizer, showing through experiments that low‑rank Muon matches or surpasses vanilla Muon on GPT‑2 and LLaMA pretraining, especially for larger models. Theoretical analysis provides iteration‑complexity bounds for both low‑rank MSGD and low‑rank Muon under heavy‑tailed noise.
By Chuan He, Zhanwang Deng, Zhaosong Lu
arXiv:2606. 03899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Muon has recently demonstrated strong empirical performance in large language model training, but the theoretical role of momentum in Muon remains unclear.
By Xianliang Li, Zihan Zhang, Weiyang Liu, Han Bao
arXiv:2606. 30509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Matrix factorization (i.
By Mark Rhee, Jamie Simon, Dhruva Karkada