arXiv:2609.39595v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Practical Muon maintains momentum and performs a small, fixed number of Newton--Schulz iterations separately for each parameter matrix, often with a Ne...
By Hanyng Peng, Hui Wang, Yue Yu
The paper introduces low‑rank orthogonalization, a technique that exploits the low‑rank nature of gradients in neural network training to perform matrix orthogonalization more efficiently. Building on this, the authors present low‑rank matrix‑signed gradient descent (MSGD) and a low‑rank variant of the Muon optimizer, showing through experiments that low‑rank Muon matches or surpasses vanilla Muon on GPT‑2 and LLaMA pretraining, especially for larger models. Theoretical analysis provides iteration‑complexity bounds for both low‑rank MSGD and low‑rank Muon under heavy‑tailed noise.
By Chuan He, Zhanwang Deng, Zhaosong Lu
arXiv:2609.07597v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Muon can be interpreted as optimizing a linear local objective over a spectral-norm ball. This gives a matrix-sign update that preserves the singular...
By Qiaozhe Zhang, Jun Sun, Yingzhuang Liu
arXiv:2607. 20512v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Muon optimizer reaches the grokking threshold on modular arithmetic faster than AdamW.
By Yufeng Wang
The paper presents the first asymptotic convergence guarantees for the Muon algorithm, showing that with suitable hyperparameters the iterates satisfy ≠≠ ∥∇f(x_k)∥ → 0 and, under a global Polyak-ℒojasiewicz condition, the function values converge linearly. It reveals that Muon’s implicit regularization acts as a bounded preconditioner, framing Muon as a preconditioned Polyak heavy‑ball method and enabling a Lyapunov analysis. Building on this insight, the authors introduce Muesterov, a Nesterov‑based variant, and prove it shares the same convergence guarantees, extending the theory beyond the heavy‑ball setting; numerical experiments on a scalar cross‑entropy problem and preliminary nanoGPT simulations support the theoretical findings.
By Arthur C. B. de Oliveira, Dhruv D. Jatkar, Guilherme S. Vicinansa, Eduardo D. Sontag
arXiv:2602. 05725v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon updates matrix parameters via the matrix sign of the gradient and has shown strong empirical gains, yet its dynamics and scaling behavior remain unclear in theory.
By Binghui Li, Kaifei Wang, Han Zhong, Pinyan Lu, Liwei Wang
arXiv:2607. 19771v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon and related matrix-sign optimizers are increasingly used to pre-train large language models, but their effect on the internal geometry of individual weight matrices is not well understood.
By Jiachun Li
arXiv:2608. 05136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gradient descent on a factored model $W = UV^\top$ is implicitly biased toward low-rank solutions, while Adam, starting from the same small initialization, is not.
By Devender Singh
The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.
By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.
By Naoki Sato, Hiroki Naganuma, Hideaki Iiduka
arXiv:2606. 12921v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) significantly reduces compute and memory costs for finetuning Deep Learning models but is often harder to tune than dense training: when using factor-wise optimizers such as AdamW, it is sensitive to initialization choices, its optimal learning rates transfer poorly across ranks, and it often fails to beat dense baselines.
By Franz Louis Cesista, Katherine Crowson, C\'edric Simal, Stella Biderman
arXiv:2608. 04607v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods are the standard instruments for the training of deep neural networks (DNNs).
By Thang Do, Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen