arXiv Machine Learning

Muon learns balanced solutions in matrix factorization without slow saddle-to-saddle dynamics

arXiv:2606. 30509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Matrix factorization (i.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Low-rank Orthogonalization for Large-scale Matrix Optimization with Applications to Foundation Model Training

The paper introduces low‑rank orthogonalization, a technique that exploits the low‑rank nature of gradients in neural network training to perform matrix orthogonalization more efficiently. Building on this, the authors present low‑rank matrix‑signed gradient descent (MSGD) and a low‑rank variant of the Muon optimizer, showing through experiments that low‑rank Muon matches or surpasses vanilla Muon on GPT‑2 and LLaMA pretraining, especially for larger models. Theoretical analysis provides iteration‑complexity bounds for both low‑rank MSGD and low‑rank Muon under heavy‑tailed noise.

By Chuan He, Zhanwang Deng, Zhaosong Lu
arXiv AI
6d ago

Convergence guarantees for Muon: New parameter regimes and generalizations

The paper presents the first asymptotic convergence guarantees for the Muon algorithm, showing that with suitable hyperparameters the iterates satisfy ≠≠ ∥∇f(x_k)∥ → 0 and, under a global Polyak-ℒojasiewicz condition, the function values converge linearly. It reveals that Muon’s implicit regularization acts as a bounded preconditioner, framing Muon as a preconditioned Polyak heavy‑ball method and enabling a Lyapunov analysis. Building on this insight, the authors introduce Muesterov, a Nesterov‑based variant, and prove it shares the same convergence guarantees, extending the theory beyond the heavy‑ball setting; numerical experiments on a scalar cross‑entropy problem and preliminary nanoGPT simulations support the theoretical findings.

By Arthur C. B. de Oliveira, Dhruv D. Jatkar, Guilherme S. Vicinansa, Eduardo D. Sontag
arXiv AI
Aug 25

A Physical Response-and-Memory Model for Muon Optimization

The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.

By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Convergence Bound and Critical Batch Size of Muon Optimizer

arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.

By Naoki Sato, Hiroki Naganuma, Hideaki Iiduka
arXiv AI
Jun 12

LoRA-Muon: Spectral Steepest Descent on the Low-Rank Manifold

arXiv:2606. 12921v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) significantly reduces compute and memory costs for finetuning Deep Learning models but is often harder to tune than dense training: when using factor-wise optimizers such as AdamW, it is sensitive to initialization choices, its optimal learning rates transfer poorly across ranks, and it often fails to beat dense baselines.

By Franz Louis Cesista, Katherine Crowson, C\'edric Simal, Stella Biderman