arXiv:2607. 00972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trustworthy deployment of Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems requires mechanisms for estimating when multi-stage reasoning pipelines may fail.
By Louis Donaldson, Connor Walker, Koorosh Aslansefat, Yiannis Papadopoulos
arXiv:2608. 16002v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for deploying large language model (LLM) agents in complex interactive environments.
By Zhengzhao Ma. Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le Sun
arXiv:2608. 14707v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems become increasingly capable, coordinating agents under uncertainty becomes a fundamental challenge.
By John Knowlton, Aritra Guha, Risto Miikkulainen
arXiv:2607. 02186v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Software development is a complex task that demands cooperation among agents with diverse roles.
By Temitayo Olamilekan Ogunsusi, Lijun Qian, Xishuang Dong
arXiv:2607. 17331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems record transactions reliably but still delegate almost all operational decision-making to human specialists, because classical rule-based automation cannot reason about exceptions and monolithic AI assistants degrade when asked to coordinate across functional boundaries.
By Zhihao Liu, Tianyu Wang, Xi Vincent Wang, Lihui Wang
arXiv:2607. 07989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems enable complex problem solving through coordinated reasoning and action, but their distributed structure also introduces new challenges in diagnosing system-level failures.
By Yufei Xia, Anjun Gao, Yueyang Quan, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang
arXiv:2605. 20173v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Production LLM agents combine stochastic model outputs with deterministic software systems, yet the boundary between the two is rarely treated as a first-class architectural object.
By Vasundra Srinivasan
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly evaluated on their ability to use tools, plan multi-step tasks, coordinate with other agents, and operate over extended horizons. Reported benchmark gains often obscure recurring failure modes documented across otherwise unrelated evaluation efforts.
In large-scale enterprise settings, centralized multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly adopted, in which a coordinator delegates user requests to lightweight, domain-specialized sub-agents. While this architecture improves modularity, scalability, and cost efficiency, its reliability depends not only on accurate routing but also on sub-agents' ability to calibrate their responses to capability constraints.
arXiv:2606. 17383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic artificial intelligence systems introduce a new class of model risk.
By Matthew Francis Dixon
arXiv:2606. 29026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent AI systems can improve answer selection by allowing different language models to exchange reasoning traces, revise initial predictions, and support a final decision.
By Shahnewaz Karim Sakib, Anindya Bijoy Das
arXiv:2608. 14109v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous LLM agents are increasingly deployed in complex real-world workflows, yet they remain vulnerable to runtime behavioral drift, a silent deviation from the original task that can lead to irreversible side effects on external systems.
By Ismail El Hamraoui, Sagar Jose, Nicolas Bureau, Robert Plana