arXiv AI By Burkay Tun\c{c}t\"urk, Koorosh Aslansefat, Yiannis Papadopoulos, Bao Nguyen

More Agents, More Reliable? System-Level Reliability of Multi-Agent LLMs under Operational-Profile Uncertainty

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 27

UMAS: System-Level Uncertainty Quantification for Multi-Agent LLM Systems

UMAS is a parameter‑free, cost‑neutral framework for system‑level uncertainty quantification in multi‑agent large language model systems. It estimates the credibility of inter‑agent influence using each generation’s intrinsic confidence, modulates uncertainty updates at each node, and aggregates these into a system‑level estimate. Evaluations on Debate and DyLAN show UMAS outperforms state‑of‑the‑art baselines by an average of 10.54 AUROC points and improves hallucination detection and answer selection, boosting MAS accuracy by up to 12.6 points on specific tasks.

By Hanwen Li, Jinhao Duan, Xiaoshuang Shi, Yue Zhang, Tianlong Chen, Kaidi Xu, Chenxi Yuan
arXiv AI
Jun 2

POIROT: Interrogating Agents for Failure Detection in Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv:2606. 02282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Orchestrating Large Language Models into Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) has unlocked remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet emergent failures and hallucinations that resist characterisation block their deployment in safety-critical domains -- a gap made legally untenable by emerging AI regulation.

By I\~naki Dellibarda Varela, R. Sendra-Arranz, Pablo Romero-Sorozabal, J. M. Valverde-Garc\'ia, Annemarie F. Laudanski, \'Alvaro Guti\'errez, Eduardo Rocon, Manuel Cebrian