arXiv:2607. 26765v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background/Objectives: Dermoscopic skin lesion classifiers often lose accuracy under domain shift across imaging devices, illumination, and capture artifacts.
By Alexander Kozachok, Ilya Latyshev, Evgeny Karpulevich, Elena Kozachok, Egor Ushakov, Oleg Samovarov
Background/Objectives: Dermoscopic skin lesion classifiers often lose accuracy under domain shift across imaging devices, illumination, and capture artifacts. We study how data augmentation improves the robustness of a binary malignant-versus-non-malignant classifier, with emphasis on out-of-domain (OOD) generalization.
The study compares five pre‑trained convolutional neural networks—ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, and InceptionV3—for melanoma detection using dermatoscopic and histopathological image datasets. Accuracy varied across models and modalities, with ResNet50 achieving the highest scores (84% on HAM10000 and 83% on CR‑AI4SkIN) and InceptionV3 the lowest (71% on ISIC 2018). The results show that a model’s performance on dermatoscopic images does not necessarily predict its performance on histopathological images.
By Wagner Moreno Schmitz, Marco Antonio de Castro Barbosa, Thiago Magalh\~aes Amaral, Dalcimar Casanova, Jefferson Tales Oliva
MDSkin-Net is a multi‑task skin lesion analysis framework that integrates Pattern Analysis priors into a hybrid CNN‑Transformer architecture. It introduces a Pattern Analysis‑Guided Attention Module (PAGAM) with improved Efficient Channel Attention, Multi‑Scale Spatial Attention, and Biased Asymmetry Attention, along with a multi‑scale spatial alignment regularization that uses segmentation masks as soft supervision. Trained only on the ISIC 2017 training split, the model achieves high segmentation and classification performance on multiple datasets, demonstrating strong zero‑shot generalization across different cohorts.
By Yijian Li, Saad Bedros, Paul Bigliardi, Mei Bigliardi Qi, Vassilios Morellas, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos
The study examines why dermatology AI models, largely trained on light‑skinned, cancer‑focused images, perform poorly when applied to diverse patient populations. By comparing a cancer‑trained baseline, two dermatology foundation models, and a general‑purpose vision model on tone‑stratified and disease‑shifted datasets, the authors find that disease‑distribution shift, rather than skin‑tone underrepresentation, is the primary cause of generalization failure. Representation analysis shows that cancer‑specialized features lack transferable structure, while dermatology‑pretrained features maintain stronger clustering, and lightweight adaptation with about ten labeled examples per category can recover most performance.
By Nirajan Kunwor, Sanjaya Poudel, Quoc-Huy Trinh, Jahidul Arafat, Sunil Kumar Gaire
arXiv:2609.38560v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a rare form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that is often misdiagnosed in early stages due to its visual similarity to benign in...
By Mohamed Hazem, Tarek Waleed, Omar Khaled, Nada Omar, Mahmoud Raslan, Marwa Mohamed Fawzy, Aya Fahim, Rania M. Mogawer, Ahmed Mourad, Kariman Mansour, Muhammad Rushdi
Acne vulgaris affects most adolescents and many adults. Accurate severity grading guides treatment, monitoring, and clinical trial endpoints, but manual assessment using the Investigator's Global Assessment or Hayashi criteria is limited by inter-rater variability and inconsistent imaging conditions.
arXiv:2609.36400v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deep learning classifiers for dermoscopic skin lesions often reach high in-distribution accuracy while quietly relying on spurious background cues su...
By Youssef Attia, Debasmita Mukherjee
The paper introduces AdaConRed, a label‑free post‑conformal decision rule that transforms ambiguous conformal prediction sets into single class assignments for medical image classification. It employs a five‑stage pipeline—vision‑language generative augmentation, a frozen DermFoundation encoder, a lightweight MLP classifier, an entropy‑modulated margin‑aware nonconformity score, and a reassignment step for transitional samples—to improve accuracy on OSCC and ISIC benchmarks. Results show notable gains in malignant class accuracy while maintaining overall performance.
By Saibal Ghosh, Samarup Bhattacharya, Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Umapada Pal, Tapabrata Chakraborti
FedHisto-PAST v2 is a parameter‑efficient, stain‑aware federated learning framework for cross‑site lung histopathology classification, combining a frozen HIBOU‑B foundation model with techniques such as paired‑view prediction, feature consistency, prototype learning, and adaptive aggregation. In a five‑client, non‑IID simulation and an exploratory LungHist700 cohort, the method achieved a Macro‑F1 of 0.7286 and a balanced accuracy of 0.7305, with the prediction‑level consistency component providing the most clear independent benefit. The framework updated only about 1.25% of the model parameters, demonstrating efficient adaptation while acknowledging limitations in privacy guarantees and clinical validation.
By Muhammad Muhtasim Shahriar, M. M. Golam Hafiz, Saad Aloteibi, Mohammad Ali Moni
arXiv:2609.07180v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for nearly 80% of skin cancer di- agnoses. Its optimal clinical managem...
By Alexandros Papadopoulos, Chrysa Episkopou, Ioannis Sarafis, Aimilios Lallas, Anastasios Delopoulos
LENS‑GRF is a permutation‑invariant lesion evidence network that uses a Set‑Transformer and gated residual fusion to combine global facial context with localized lesion patches for four‑class acne severity grading. The framework integrates adaptive facial skin segmentation, a Vision Transformer prior, and a lesion set transformer that encodes spatial geometry, with a gating mechanism that modulates local residual contributions. In experiments on ACNE04 and PLSBRACNE01, the fully automated model achieved 80.82% accuracy, while using ground‑truth lesion annotations raised accuracy to 95.89% and a Quadratic Weighted Kappa of 0.9753; zero‑shot evaluation on the full cohort yielded 35.00% accuracy versus 42.50% for a global baseline, and oracle analyses on a 148‑subject cohort showed improved accuracy and QWK up to 47.97% and 0.5799.
By Muhammad Muhtasim Shahriar, M. F. Mridha