arXiv:2603. 29466v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing methods for quantifying predictive uncertainty in neural networks are either computationally intractable for large language models or require access to training data that is typically unavailable.
By Nils Gr\"unefeld, Jes Frellsen, Christian Hardmeier
arXiv:2601. 07965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When a model knows when it does not know, many possibilities emerge.
By Chenjie Hao, Weyl Lu, Yuko Ishiwaka, Zengyi Li, Weier Wan, Yubei Chen
The paper introduces CLEAR, a lightweight, task‑agnostic post‑hoc method that enhances evidential robustness in deep learning models without retraining. CLEAR uses held‑out calibration data to map the geometry of the model’s latent space, then generates perturbation views at inference to detect latent conflict. When high conflict is found, CLEAR selectively reduces evidential strength while preserving evidence for latent‑consistent inputs, achieving significant improvements in OOD and adversarial AUROC on ImageNet→CUB and running much faster than competing methods.
By Charmaine Barker, Daniel Bethell, Simos Gerasimou
arXiv:2606. 29951v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpretable Mesomorphic Neural Networks (IMNs) offer a promising framework that combines the predictive power of deep neural networks with the interpretability of linear models.
By Hugo L. Hammer, Vajira Thambawita, Kristoffer Herland Hellton, P{\aa}l Halvorsen
arXiv:2606. 28654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep Neural Network (DNN) classifiers suffer from poor calibration when their softmax outputs (predictive confidence) deviate from the empirical likelihoods.
By Thiru Thillai Nadarasar Bahavan, Sachith Seneviratne, Saman Halgamuge
arXiv:2605. 22864v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The maximum softmax probability (MSP) represents a default approach when evaluating uncertainty quantification for language model generation with structured output.
By Aliai Eusebi, Alexander Herzog, Xiaoyu Liang, Marie Vasek, Enrico Mariconti, Lorenzo Cavallaro
arXiv:2605. 30188v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable probability estimates are critical in many machine learning applications, yet modern classifiers are often poorly calibrated.
By Eug\`ene Berta, David Holzm\"uller, Francis Bach, Michael I. Jordan
arXiv:2608. 07419v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Preference alignment often makes large language models (LLMs) overconfident and poorly calibrated.
By Ruochen Jin, Zhanliang Wang, Zongyu Dai, Jiancong Xiao, Bojian Hou
arXiv:2606. 16214v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern deep learning models remain notoriously prone to overconfidence, limiting their reliability in high-stakes applications.
By Tobias Jan Wieczorek, Leon de Andrade, Thomas M\"ollenhoff, Marcus Rohrbach
arXiv:2610. 09020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern neural networks are often miscalibrated, with a tendency to overconfidence.
By Idan Horowitz, Avigdor Gal
arXiv:2608.30230v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Test-time prompt tuning (TPT) has emerged as a powerful paradigm, refining prompts for each test sample via entropy minimization (EM) over multiple aug...
By Jungwon Choi, Hyeonseo Jang, Kibok Lee, Eunwoo Kim
arXiv:2505. 23866v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks have been increasingly used in safety-critical applications such as medical diagnosis and autonomous driving.
By Chengli Tan, Yubo Zhou, Haishan Ye, Guang Dai, Junmin Liu, Zengjie Song, Jiangshe Zhang, Zixiang Zhao, Yunda Hao, Yong Xu