arXiv AI

RAILS: Verification-Native Clearing For Agentic Commerce

arXiv:2606. 08790v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous agents negotiate, purchase, deploy code, and move funds, but no neutral mechanism determines whether they met their delegated obligation, who is responsible when they did not, or which settlement action follows.

arXiv AI
2d ago

SoK: Decentralized Agent Economic Infrastructure

arXiv:2610.01756v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Decentralized agent economies increasingly build a single task from protocols that were designed and secured separately. This creates a simple proble...

By Rui Sun, Xihan Xiong, Qin Wang, Fei Gao, Zelin Li, Zehua Cheng, Jiahao Sun, Zhipeng Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 2

A Formal Analysis of Agent Payment Protocols

The paper presents a formal analysis of four agent payment protocols—x402, MPP, ACP, and AP2—using the Tamarin prover. By modeling each protocol’s roles, state, and trust assumptions, the authors verify 86 cases, reproducing 46 known results and uncovering 40 new formal-consistency findings. They further validate ten findings through implementation proofs of concept, SDK/schema witnesses, and executable traces, highlighting the importance of consistent delegated authorization across all protocol stages.

By Ke Jiang, Mohan Yu, Yuan Chang, Mohit Kumar Jangid, Jianyu Niu, Cong Wang, Yinqian Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 19

PACE: Policy-Attested Contract Execution for Safe AI Agents in Decentralized Finance

The paper introduces PACE (Policy‑Attested Contract Execution), a framework that sits between large‑language‑model (LLM) based autonomous AI agents and on‑chain DeFi operations. PACE defines typed transaction intents, a deterministic policy verifier, and signed Policy Decision Records (PDRs) that cryptographically bind an approved intent, policy, and simulation report to the exact on‑chain execution bytes, providing replay and expiration protection. In evaluations across 40 tasks and six baselines, PACE achieves zero unsafe executions and zero false positives, outperforming unguarded agents by a large margin.

By Rabimba Karanjai (Larry), Yang Lu (Larry), Richard Williamson (Larry), Hemanth Hm (Larry), Prakhar Mehrotra (Larry), Lei Xu (Larry), Weidong (Larry), Shi
arXiv AI
Sep 7

FinalityBench: An Effect-Level Benchmark for Agent Decisions Under Delayed and Conflicting Financial Finality

FinalityBench is an executable benchmark that tests how agents decide on shipping, re‑capturing, refunding, or waiting when a merchant’s payment processor, ledger, ERP, and bank feed receive delayed, duplicated, dropped, or reordered messages, causing contradictory beliefs about an order. The benchmark uses a hidden canonical event log and faulted delivery streams to generate system views, scoring each episode by the merchant’s terminal economic position relative to a privileged reference. It contains 321 tasks, including 45 twin pairs where all four views are identical yet the correct disposition differs, and evaluates nine programmatic policies, revealing that a ship‑on‑first‑sign policy performs best by accuracy but worst by paired loss, while a runtime‑gated irreversible‑action policy achieves 85.4% accuracy without losing money.

By Abhishek Sharma
arXiv AI
Sep 4

The Civilization Framework: Sovereign-Anchored Communication Between Personal Multi-Agent Systems

The Civilization Framework proposes a new way for AI systems to communicate by treating the entire civilization—one human sovereign, a persistent ledger, and interchangeable agents—as the addressable party, rather than individual agents. It introduces the Embassy Protocol, an asynchronous, carrier‑agnostic overlay that routes messages to a ledger endpoint where any online agent of the receiver can process them, with commitment state on both ledgers serving as the ground truth. The framework also identifies a temporal‑weight effect in AI‑to‑AI communication, demonstrates its impact in a preregistered experiment, and explores mitigation strategies such as instruction‑level provenance labeling and sealed‑answer accuracy equivalence. whyItMatters":"The framework aims to reduce context loss and authority bias in AI interactions by grounding communication in a shared ledger and sovereign oversight, potentially improving reliability and accountability in multi‑agent systems."

By Guangjun Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 15

AcquireBound: Runtime Authorization for Resources Acquired by AI Agents

AcquireBound is a runtime authorization framework that ensures AI agents can safely acquire and activate resources such as compute, credentials, and services. It quarantines acquired outputs, resolves their capabilities through authenticated evidence, and activates them only after verifying a manifest, provenance, and relational constraints. The system demonstrates strong safety properties, passing extensive benign and unsafe trace tests across multiple resource classes.

By Genliang Zhu