arXiv:2606. 31023v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hard-constrained sequential decision systems have no certified way to spend the test-time compute of modern AI: executing the multi-step drafts of a learned policy or a frozen LLM forfeits the feasibility guarantee a trusted solver provides, while invoking the solver at every step forfeits the speed the AI offers.
By Chenyu Zhou, Qiliang Jiang, Shuning Wu, Xu Zhou
arXiv:2608. 08265v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Oracle routing measures how much a pool of language models could gain from per-query selection, but the diagnostic has two flaws: testing against a best fixed model selected on the same examples invalidates paired inference, and a full-information oracle sees outcomes no deployable router observes.
By Ibne Farabi Shihab, Abu Sa-Adat Mohamed Moon-Im Al Ahsan, Md Najmus Swaqeeb
arXiv:2606. 06460v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autonomous LLM agents increasingly hold real credentials and operate infrastructure with no human in the loop, yet operators have no standard way to tell an agent a resource is off-limits, or to ask a running agent to stand down: access controls either admit it or hard-fail it.
By Thamilvendhan Munirathinam
arXiv:2608. 06690v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Most language-model access controls regulate behavior while leaving the same computation available to every request.
By Zhuoheng Huang, Mukesh Singh
arXiv:2608. 14927v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems can improve reasoning by spending more computation, but deployment requires deciding when extra collaboration is worth its cost.
By Chih-Hsuan Yang, Jingyan Jiang, Cheng-Hau Yang, Vikram Vasudevan, Huihuo Zheng, Venkatram Vishwanath, Rajeev Thakur
arXiv:2606. 07316v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Can a committee of LLM agents reach agreement that is certifiable at the level of meaning, not only at the level of a label?
By Haoran Xu, Lei Zhang, Iadh Ounis, Xianbin Wang
arXiv:2607. 19338v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Coding agents increasingly operate in executable environments where a failed attempt produces actionable feedback rather than merely an incorrect answer.
By Qijia He, Jiayi Cheng, Chenqian Le, Rui Wang, Xunmei Liu, Yixian Chen, Jie Mei, Zhihao Wang, Xupeng Chen, Yuhuan Chen, Tao Wang
arXiv:2608. 02989v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding verifies a tree of draft tokens in one target-model forward pass.
By Shuang Liang (Mark), Hao (Mark), Chen, Zhiwen Mo, Qianzhou Wang, Guoyu Li, Lingxiao Ma, Wayne Luk
arXiv:2607. 29400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A routing decision can be revised at the next transaction, but a latched source exclusion persists across later decisions.
By Xiyang Zhang, Hongzhi Wang, Yuanhe Tian
arXiv:2606. 08790v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous agents negotiate, purchase, deploy code, and move funds, but no neutral mechanism determines whether they met their delegated obligation, who is responsible when they did not, or which settlement action follows.
By Adrian de Valois-Franklin, Alex Bogdan
arXiv:2606. 19356v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When multi-agent LLM systems produce bad answers, not all failures are equal: some answers are grounded in the right material but incomplete, while others are simply ungrounded and should be stopped.
By Anantha Sharma
arXiv:2608. 14641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic systems increasingly delegate model selection to a router, yet open-source routers are usually evaluated with different tasks, candidate pools, and execution protocols, limiting direct comparison.
By Kiran N. Kumar, Santhosh K. Saminathan