arXiv Machine Learning

Be Fair! Can Machine Learning Engineering Agents Adhere to Fairness Constraints?

arXiv:2606. 04971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning engineering (MLE) agents promise to automate end-to-end ML pipeline development from raw data and natural language instructions, potentially making ML accessible to non-technical domain experts.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14

Controllable Generation of Diverse Dermatological Imagery for Fair and Efficient Malignancy Classification

Accurate dermatological diagnosis naturally necessitates equitable performance across diverse populations, yet a systematic lack of expertly annotated images, especially for underrepresented skin tones and rare diseases, impedes progress toward measurably fair methods. We introduce cgDDI (Controllable Generation of Diverse Dermatological Imagery), a hybrid framework that (1) synthesizes realistic healthy skin samples without disturbing other input properties, (2) maps single-sample rare lesions onto novel skin-tones and locations non-parametrically, and (3) allows for efficient parametric generation with as few as 10 training samples.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

On the Societal Impact of Machine Learning

This PhD thesis examines how machine learning (ML) influences society, noting that ML increasingly shapes consequential decisions and recommendations. It highlights the risk of discriminatory effects when fairness is not explicitly considered in data‑driven systems. The work proposes methods for measuring fairness, decomposing ML systems to anticipate bias, and implementing interventions that reduce discrimination while preserving utility, and it outlines future research directions as ML, including generative AI, becomes more integrated into society.

By Joachim Baumann
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

Medical Imaging AI Competitions Lack Fairness

Benchmarking competitions are central to AI development in medical imaging, but it is unclear if they provide representative, accessible, and reusable data for clinical relevance. This study systematically examined 249 challenges (458 tasks) across 19 imaging modalities, finding limited geographic, modality, and problem-type representation. Additionally, many datasets suffer from restrictive access, ambiguous licensing, and poor documentation, hindering reproducibility and long-term reuse.

By Annika Reinke, Evangelia Christodoulou, Sthuthi Sadananda, A. Emre Kavur, Khrystyna Faryna, Daan Schouten, Bennett A. Landman, Carole Sudre, Olivier Colliot, Nick Heller, Sophie Loizillon, Martin Ma\v{s}ka, Ma\"elys Solal, Arya Yazdan-Panah, Vilma Bozgo, \"Omer S\"umer, Siem de Jong, Sophie Fischer, Michal Kozubek, Tim R\"adsch, Nadim Hammoud, Fruzsina Moln\'ar-G\'abor, Steven Hicks, Michael A. Riegler, Anindo Saha, Vajira Thambawita, Pal Halvorsen, Amelia Jim\'enez-S\'anchez, Qingyang Yang, Veronika Cheplygina, Sabrina Bottazzi, Alexander Seitel, Spyridon Bakas, Alexandros Karargyris, Kiran Vaidhya Venkadesh, Bram van Ginneken, Lena Maier-Hein
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Beyond Procedure: Substantive Fairness in Conformal Prediction

arXiv:2602. 16794v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) offers distribution-free uncertainty quantification for machine learning models, yet its interplay with fairness in downstream decision-making remains underexplored.

By Pengqi Liu, Zijun Yu, Mouloud Belbahri, Arthur Charpentier, Masoud Asgharian, Jesse C. Cresswell
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

FairSelect: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Level and Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness

Algorithmic fairness methods are increasingly used to identify and mitigate bias in machine learning models, yet most approaches are evaluated in isolation and along single demographic axes. This limits practical guidance for selecting fairness strategies, where disparities may arise across intersectional subgroups and across multiple stages of the modeling lifecycle.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Advancing Health Equity through Multi-Level Fairness in Health Informatics

The paper examines how multi‑level fairness techniques—combining several bias‑mitigation steps—can reduce biases across patient demographics in health informatics. It reviews current literature, identifies gaps in implementation and reporting of health equity outcomes, and evaluates the role of reporting standards such as MINIMAR and TRIPOD in enhancing transparency. The authors conclude with recommendations to improve reporting transparency, broaden adoption of multi‑level fairness methods, and explicitly prioritize health equity in future research.

By Nick Souligne, Vignesh Subbian