The paper introduces a post‑processing framework that uses model ensembling to achieve fairness‑aware predictions. It is designed to work independently of any specific model internals, making it applicable to a wide range of learning tasks, model architectures, and fairness definitions. Experiments on classification, regression, and survival analysis show that the framework improves fairness while preserving predictive accuracy.
arXiv:2606. 00656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring fair and equitable treatment across diverse groups, particularly in multi-class classification tasks, poses a significant challenge due to the persistent biases inherent in machine learning models.
arXiv:2604. 16610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning models often inherit biases from historical data, raising critical concerns about fairness and accountability.
arXiv:2606. 28097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-hoc controllability of fair machine learning models, the ability to control the trade-off between fairness and accuracy after training, is valuable for practical deployment.
arXiv:2609.07959v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models are widely used in clinical applications, social media, law enforcement and critical infrastructure. Verifying whether their...
arXiv:2608. 14211v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) have emerged as leading methods for tabular predictive tasks, leveraging in-context learning to predict on new data without task-specific training.
arXiv:2607. 08953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Algorithmic fairness methods are increasingly used to identify and mitigate bias in machine learning models, yet most approaches are evaluated in isolation and along single demographic axes.
arXiv:2509. 16462v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes decision-making systems, where biased predictions can reinforce social and economic disparities.
arXiv:2602. 16794v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) offers distribution-free uncertainty quantification for machine learning models, yet its interplay with fairness in downstream decision-making remains underexplored.
Algorithmic fairness methods are increasingly used to identify and mitigate bias in machine learning models, yet most approaches are evaluated in isolation and along single demographic axes. This limits practical guidance for selecting fairness strategies, where disparities may arise across intersectional subgroups and across multiple stages of the modeling lifecycle.
arXiv:2603. 21393v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The widespread use of AI and ML models in sensitive areas raises significant concerns about fairness.
The paper introduces a node‑level relaxation of individual fairness called local predictive consistency, where each prediction is compared to a similarity‑weighted average of predictions in its local neighborhood. This approach yields an interpretable fairness score and a regularized learning method based on local residuals, and it explicitly constructs the neighborhood graph with threshold selection guided by graph‑coverage diagnostics. The authors apply the method to binary classification, regression, and time‑to‑event prediction, and compare it with pairwise constraint‑based fairness formulations to analyze fairness‑performance trade‑offs.
arXiv:2606. 00826v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Strategic machine learning investigates scenarios where agents manipulate their features to receive favorable decisions from predictive models.